Carter Roy

It's the court system.

There's lots of feet dragging and appeals.

As far as UFO cases go, there's a lot of evidence handed over.

official medical records, witness statements, testimony from NASA, the Air Force, the Army, and the Navy.

Mind you, the judge is in a tough position.

The government is technically his employer, and if he sides with Betty and the Landrums, he could be labeled as that UFO judge, which would probably be disastrous for his reputation and career.

I mean,

What would you do in that situation?

Ultimately, the judge doesn't let the case go to trial.

And when his ruling finally comes out, it's clear that he weighs the results of the government's investigation heavily.

He writes, quote,

The attendant facts failed to establish that the unidentified flying object or helicopters were owned and operated by the U.S.

government or any agency or instrumentality thereof.

The judge dismisses the case for a lack of evidence.

Now, especially in a case that involves a UFO claim, when the average person hears lack of evidence, there's a pretty good chance their mind hears it didn't happen or it's a hoax.

but that's not what the judge actually says.

You'll notice the decision never questions Betty or the Landrums' account of that night.

It doesn't question their pain or suffering.

It simply says there's not enough evidence that the UFO and helicopters belonged to the government, which, as I said, is a conclusion drawn largely from the government's findings.

So...