Casey Liss
👤 SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Should I shoot JPEG in RAW on the Canon or even the iPhone? Should I try something like Pixelmator Pro or stick with Apple Photos Editor? Should I avoid RAW completely since I'm such a noob? How does one get good at this? I missed the auto-enhance feature on Apple Photos and generally... Excuse me, I messed with the auto-enhance feature on Apple Photos and generally like the results...
Should I shoot JPEG in RAW on the Canon or even the iPhone? Should I try something like Pixelmator Pro or stick with Apple Photos Editor? Should I avoid RAW completely since I'm such a noob? How does one get good at this? I missed the auto-enhance feature on Apple Photos and generally... Excuse me, I messed with the auto-enhance feature on Apple Photos and generally like the results...
But that is a big no-no with photographers, as it can overexpose or make some weird edits based on machine learning, maybe? I do generally enjoy photography as a hobby, but it seems daunting to me. I appreciate any tips for a very, very basic start to taking photos and editing them.
But that is a big no-no with photographers, as it can overexpose or make some weird edits based on machine learning, maybe? I do generally enjoy photography as a hobby, but it seems daunting to me. I appreciate any tips for a very, very basic start to taking photos and editing them.
This was genuinely written by somebody named Maxell Amador, but it could have been damn near word for word written by me. So, gentlemen, I don't care which one of you it is. Maybe we'll start with Marco, but tell me, what do I do? What does Maxell do? What do we do?
This was genuinely written by somebody named Maxell Amador, but it could have been damn near word for word written by me. So, gentlemen, I don't care which one of you it is. Maybe we'll start with Marco, but tell me, what do I do? What does Maxell do? What do we do?
Those are great answers. Thank you, gentlemen. Additionally, we have Scott Shuchart, who writes, I'm trying to compress three large-ish files, about 20 to 60 gigabytes each, using the Finder, and they're taking forever. According to Activity Monitor, Archive Service, which I assume is a compressor, is running six threads, but only using between 95% and 140% CPU.
Those are great answers. Thank you, gentlemen. Additionally, we have Scott Shuchart, who writes, I'm trying to compress three large-ish files, about 20 to 60 gigabytes each, using the Finder, and they're taking forever. According to Activity Monitor, Archive Service, which I assume is a compressor, is running six threads, but only using between 95% and 140% CPU.
This is in a MacBook Pro M2 Pro with 10 cores. Nothing else significant is happening. And it's plugged in with no fan noise. Why can't it spin up at least three performance cores to get this done faster? What are these chips for?
This is in a MacBook Pro M2 Pro with 10 cores. Nothing else significant is happening. And it's plugged in with no fan noise. Why can't it spin up at least three performance cores to get this done faster? What are these chips for?
Now the show is over. They didn't even mean to begin. Cause it was accidental. Oh, it was accidental. John didn't do any research. Marco and Casey wouldn't let him. Cause it was accidental. Oh, it was accidental. And you can find the show notes at atp.fm. And if you're into Mastodon, you can follow them at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S.
Now the show is over. They didn't even mean to begin. Cause it was accidental. Oh, it was accidental. John didn't do any research. Marco and Casey wouldn't let him. Cause it was accidental. Oh, it was accidental. And you can find the show notes at atp.fm. And if you're into Mastodon, you can follow them at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S.
So that's K-C-L-I-S-M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-
So that's K-C-L-I-S-M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-A-
We did talk about it. Actually, maybe it was Rectifs. We were talking about using it to rearrange stuff on the screen. That was Rectifs, I believe. All right, anyway, I have used it. Yeah, did you know that iPhone mirroring works on Intel Macs?
We did talk about it. Actually, maybe it was Rectifs. We were talking about using it to rearrange stuff on the screen. That was Rectifs, I believe. All right, anyway, I have used it. Yeah, did you know that iPhone mirroring works on Intel Macs?
Regurgitation is actually a good word. I'll get to that in a second. But many people pointed out that one of the things I was complaining about the generated podcast that it didn't mention a specific example from my article. It did mention it. Basically, I totally missed when I mentioned it because it was at the very beginning and I was too busy snarking about something else.
Regurgitation is actually a good word. I'll get to that in a second. But many people pointed out that one of the things I was complaining about the generated podcast that it didn't mention a specific example from my article. It did mention it. Basically, I totally missed when I mentioned it because it was at the very beginning and I was too busy snarking about something else.
But the other reason I missed it is that it mentioned it, but then used it as like, it was the, the mention of like emailing the artist to do something. It uses that as an example of the person who created it, uh, maintaining the copyright, right?
But the other reason I missed it is that it mentioned it, but then used it as like, it was the, the mention of like emailing the artist to do something. It uses that as an example of the person who created it, uh, maintaining the copyright, right?