Chanler

I absolutely love Revolve.

I shop there constantly, everyone.

So whether it's a big night out, a wedding, a trip, or you just need something last minute that actually works, Revolve always has it.

Go to revolve.com slash pop to shop our faves and use code pop for 15% off your first order.

And definitely check out the festival shop while you're there.

Fast shipping, easy returns.

It just makes everything easier.

That's revolve.com slash pop.

You can shop our faves and get 15% off your first order.

Offer ends April 21st, so don't miss out.

And I'm going to quote this astute Reddit post again.

But it says, calling this a technicality intentionally obscures these issues entirely.

The holdings matter beyond this case because sexual harassment law is not an infinitely elastic tool for litigating difficult professional relationships between parties who are equal.

This is kind of what I was saying earlier.

It exists to protect people who are structurally vulnerable.

People who cannot say no, who cannot walk away, who cannot protect themselves without risking their livelihood.

When that law gets deployed by someone who negotiated herself into a position of co-equal creative authority who had contractual veto power over the people allegedly harassing her and who described the relationship herself in writing as a partnership, the damage isn't just to the defendant.

It's to the law itself and the people it was built to protect.

So this is why, like, this ruling...

it just has more to do with like the people it's actually supposed to apply to versus blake yeah and it's bigger than just her no absolutely and so i want to read some quotes from judge lehman that apply here so he says not only did she reserve substantial contractual control over her participation in the film she exercised that control she enjoyed the economic independence to walk at any moment with the only consequence being that she would potentially be in breach of contract