Chanler

But this essay basically championing herself as –

Such a fighter for victims.

It's like, this is a victory day for us.

Yes.

It's a rallying cry.

It doesn't do her any favors, I believe, in the court of public opinion.

So then she cherry picks some quotes from the ruling, pops them in Canvas.

OK, Control V in Canva.

Excuse me.

And creates some beautiful graphics.

The first is the quote, Lively has come forward with affirmative evidence supporting her claim.

both with respect to the wayfarer parties following through on their intent to spread negative content about her and with respect to wallace's technological capabilities in doing so okay so this one makes sense because the retaliation you know claims are moving forward she has evidence supporting that claim there are emails there are text messages that that make people think that they're you know they're what this was a targeted effort what was the text we can bury anyone we can bury anyone that was like the headline of the the new york times article so

This makes sense.

This is this is fine.

I want to get to this one that this one that's like four over.

It's like the fourth or fifth.

It says viewed in the light most favorable to lively.

There is also sufficient evidence that it was reasonable for her to believe that the Wayfarer Party sexually harassed her by creating a hostile work environment.

Which is basically just saying, if you believe everything she's saying exactly as she said it in the most favorable way, you would believe that she had been sexually harassed.

It's like, it just doesn't, this is not.