Charles Liu

There's nothing connecting them at that moment other than the fact that they were entangled at one point in the past.

And so there is no real way that we can show that that extra dimension is necessary or even effective.

The time, the 223 attoseconds in which quantum entanglement occurs that you quoted is a very cool experimental result.

It needs to be further confirmed and things like that.

But the idea is that it doesn't give us

a lot of insight as to whether or not another dimension is necessary.

At the moment, we probably don't want to go in that direction yet.

We don't have enough information to know whether or not that's a fruitful path, so to speak, for entanglement.

Well, subspace is only vaguely determined, decided or defined in Star Trek, right?

Yeah, exactly.

But yes, if you're in a, it could be a warp drive or something like that, right?

And you are in subspace as a result of being in a warp bubble, right?

That could be considered a dimension, right?

Or it could be considered something that is in the existing spatial dimensions that just happens to be temporarily not accessible.

And yet you have subspace communications in Star Trek, so it is accessible, and it's just all kinds of weirdness.

Correct.

Well, that's one of the interesting things between Star Trek and Star Wars, right?

I love them both, but even though Star Trek has tried to be much more scientific...

Star Wars just gave up on being scientific.

Star Wars is just a space opera.