Charles Piller

Really, there has to be better honesty and transparency by institutions. And there's so much fear within those institutions if they show any weakness or admit any weakness that they'll be sued or they'll have other public relations problems.

Really, there has to be better honesty and transparency by institutions. And there's so much fear within those institutions if they show any weakness or admit any weakness that they'll be sued or they'll have other public relations problems.

Really, there has to be better honesty and transparency by institutions. And there's so much fear within those institutions if they show any weakness or admit any weakness that they'll be sued or they'll have other public relations problems.

Well, let me just say though, that I, even though I just wrote a book about really a big set of problems in Alzheimer's disease, I do feel hopeful in certain ways. And I wanted to describe a couple of those. We live in an incredibly exciting time in the sense that It's much easier now for problems to be caught because of the ability to crowdsource those problems.

Well, let me just say though, that I, even though I just wrote a book about really a big set of problems in Alzheimer's disease, I do feel hopeful in certain ways. And I wanted to describe a couple of those. We live in an incredibly exciting time in the sense that It's much easier now for problems to be caught because of the ability to crowdsource those problems.

Well, let me just say though, that I, even though I just wrote a book about really a big set of problems in Alzheimer's disease, I do feel hopeful in certain ways. And I wanted to describe a couple of those. We live in an incredibly exciting time in the sense that It's much easier now for problems to be caught because of the ability to crowdsource those problems.

So what you see is that when institutions like universities and journals and government agencies have dropped the ball on image falsification in Alzheimer's and in other fields, you've seen this sort of army of volunteer image sleuths and you've seen the rise of important whistleblowers to point out these problems and to force institutions to take notice.

So what you see is that when institutions like universities and journals and government agencies have dropped the ball on image falsification in Alzheimer's and in other fields, you've seen this sort of army of volunteer image sleuths and you've seen the rise of important whistleblowers to point out these problems and to force institutions to take notice.

So what you see is that when institutions like universities and journals and government agencies have dropped the ball on image falsification in Alzheimer's and in other fields, you've seen this sort of army of volunteer image sleuths and you've seen the rise of important whistleblowers to point out these problems and to force institutions to take notice.

This has been a very, very important and large development that I think ultimately is going to greatly benefit patients. It's certainly going to change the nature of research in Alzheimer's disease. It's already having that effect. And consequently, it's going to create openings for new thinking.

This has been a very, very important and large development that I think ultimately is going to greatly benefit patients. It's certainly going to change the nature of research in Alzheimer's disease. It's already having that effect. And consequently, it's going to create openings for new thinking.

This has been a very, very important and large development that I think ultimately is going to greatly benefit patients. It's certainly going to change the nature of research in Alzheimer's disease. It's already having that effect. And consequently, it's going to create openings for new thinking.

And there are people waiting in the wings to try to get support for new ideas and new approaches to studying these problems that will benefit from the sort of emergence of crowdsourcing and volunteers who are able to do things that institutions can't always do because of the constraints that they feel legally or in other ways.

And there are people waiting in the wings to try to get support for new ideas and new approaches to studying these problems that will benefit from the sort of emergence of crowdsourcing and volunteers who are able to do things that institutions can't always do because of the constraints that they feel legally or in other ways.

And there are people waiting in the wings to try to get support for new ideas and new approaches to studying these problems that will benefit from the sort of emergence of crowdsourcing and volunteers who are able to do things that institutions can't always do because of the constraints that they feel legally or in other ways.

Yeah. It is optimistic. And at the same time, I'm currently reading a book called The Death of Expertise. Have you heard of it? Yeah, I've heard of it. I haven't read it. That leads me to be a bit more pessimistic because they're described the phenomenon that I can relate to from the social media world that I exist in, where

Yeah. It is optimistic. And at the same time, I'm currently reading a book called The Death of Expertise. Have you heard of it? Yeah, I've heard of it. I haven't read it. That leads me to be a bit more pessimistic because they're described the phenomenon that I can relate to from the social media world that I exist in, where

Yeah. It is optimistic. And at the same time, I'm currently reading a book called The Death of Expertise. Have you heard of it? Yeah, I've heard of it. I haven't read it. That leads me to be a bit more pessimistic because they're described the phenomenon that I can relate to from the social media world that I exist in, where

Before in the past, many years ago, it was people didn't know as much science. Then it went to people were willfully ignorant. They didn't care to learn much about science, even though it was available to them. And now it's at a place where it's like, you're not just wrong, you're aggressively wrong and loud about it.

Before in the past, many years ago, it was people didn't know as much science. Then it went to people were willfully ignorant. They didn't care to learn much about science, even though it was available to them. And now it's at a place where it's like, you're not just wrong, you're aggressively wrong and loud about it.