Cheyenne Roundtree

Now, look, we're going to keep you up to date on what goes on there. We'll have it here for you on the pod. But right now, I want to do our Fact or Fiction here. This week... because as I was watching this play out on social media, particularly TikTok, I came across videos like these with hundreds of thousands of views, thousands of comments, loads of shares. Just take a listen.

OK, first of all, was Anthony Rico a lawyer for Osama bin Laden? Well, he did defend one of the men who was charged and convicted in the US versus bin Laden case, which was related to the deadly 1998 American embassy bombings in Kenya by al-Qaeda. So that is partly true. It's not technically in the terms that it's being said there that he was his defence counsel for Osama bin Laden.

OK, first of all, was Anthony Rico a lawyer for Osama bin Laden? Well, he did defend one of the men who was charged and convicted in the US versus bin Laden case, which was related to the deadly 1998 American embassy bombings in Kenya by al-Qaeda. So that is partly true. It's not technically in the terms that it's being said there that he was his defence counsel for Osama bin Laden.

OK, first of all, was Anthony Rico a lawyer for Osama bin Laden? Well, he did defend one of the men who was charged and convicted in the US versus bin Laden case, which was related to the deadly 1998 American embassy bombings in Kenya by al-Qaeda. So that is partly true. It's not technically in the terms that it's being said there that he was his defence counsel for Osama bin Laden.

Sean, you're a criminal defence attorney. You know this well. Everybody gets access to a defence, don't they? Even in the most serious of cases.

Sean, you're a criminal defence attorney. You know this well. Everybody gets access to a defence, don't they? Even in the most serious of cases.

Sean, you're a criminal defence attorney. You know this well. Everybody gets access to a defence, don't they? Even in the most serious of cases.

So in these videos, we hear people saying, okay, he's defended people like Osama bin Laden, and he's walking away from the Diddy case. Why, why, why? And saying it's because there has been a necromancy charge added to Diddy's case. This is communing with the dead, typically to predict the future. Now, trying to commune with the dead is not a criminal offense. I understand rage bait.

So in these videos, we hear people saying, okay, he's defended people like Osama bin Laden, and he's walking away from the Diddy case. Why, why, why? And saying it's because there has been a necromancy charge added to Diddy's case. This is communing with the dead, typically to predict the future. Now, trying to commune with the dead is not a criminal offense. I understand rage bait.

So in these videos, we hear people saying, okay, he's defended people like Osama bin Laden, and he's walking away from the Diddy case. Why, why, why? And saying it's because there has been a necromancy charge added to Diddy's case. This is communing with the dead, typically to predict the future. Now, trying to commune with the dead is not a criminal offense. I understand rage bait.

I understand driving traffic to your page. I understand that the algorithm, sometimes you might feel like it forces you to say things that are going to get eyes on your profile. But seriously, touch some grass.

I understand driving traffic to your page. I understand that the algorithm, sometimes you might feel like it forces you to say things that are going to get eyes on your profile. But seriously, touch some grass.

I understand driving traffic to your page. I understand that the algorithm, sometimes you might feel like it forces you to say things that are going to get eyes on your profile. But seriously, touch some grass.

We'd know about it, especially if it was black magic or voodoo. We'd hear about it. It would be front page news. But then some other people came in and they said, you're crazy. You don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't necromancy. It was necrophilia. You've got it all wrong. He wasn't charged with that. What he was more likely charged with... is necrophilia.

We'd know about it, especially if it was black magic or voodoo. We'd hear about it. It would be front page news. But then some other people came in and they said, you're crazy. You don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't necromancy. It was necrophilia. You've got it all wrong. He wasn't charged with that. What he was more likely charged with... is necrophilia.

We'd know about it, especially if it was black magic or voodoo. We'd hear about it. It would be front page news. But then some other people came in and they said, you're crazy. You don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't necromancy. It was necrophilia. You've got it all wrong. He wasn't charged with that. What he was more likely charged with... is necrophilia.

I understand once again that this is going to drive traffic to your page, but like Sean's just said, if there was another superseding indictment that added on a fourth charge of necrophilia, you would know about it. It would be front page news. This is more than unsubstantiated. So we're going to wrap that up there. We told you what was in the letter. It didn't have anything in it about necromancy.

I understand once again that this is going to drive traffic to your page, but like Sean's just said, if there was another superseding indictment that added on a fourth charge of necrophilia, you would know about it. It would be front page news. This is more than unsubstantiated. So we're going to wrap that up there. We told you what was in the letter. It didn't have anything in it about necromancy.

I understand once again that this is going to drive traffic to your page, but like Sean's just said, if there was another superseding indictment that added on a fourth charge of necrophilia, you would know about it. It would be front page news. This is more than unsubstantiated. So we're going to wrap that up there. We told you what was in the letter. It didn't have anything in it about necromancy.

of raping her when she was 13 at the VMAs in 2000. The lawsuit later added Jay-Z, real name Sean Carter, as a defendant. Both rappers denied the claims and the case has now been dropped with prejudice. Sean, what does that mean with prejudice?