Chris Masterjohn

So I think this, the skill training is, is big for spill off into neurological disease because,

But I'm just trying to connect them to the three things.

I'm not sure exactly what they have lower rates of death from.

We need more studies to see that.

But the body mechanics, I think, is a very interesting possible explanation of why they'd have lower rates of cancer.

And what you just said, I think, is a great explanation of why they would have lower rates of neurological disease.

And I think it's kind of like, if you look at,

I think another thing that people mistake in the longevity space is they spend too much time thinking about

reverse engineering 100 backwards.

What do I want to not have lost by that time?

And not enough time just being in peak function.

Because if you look at bone mass, for example, bone mass goes up until you're in your mid-20s, maybe 25 to 30.

There's a little bit difference with men and women.

But then it just goes down after that.

And if you want to have good bone mass when you're 75, the most...

important asset you could possibly have is to have really good peak bone mass when you're 25, right?

So I really think that like, it's just like I said before, you might not think memorizing a string of 25 numbers is important at any age, but if you're gonna have really awesome peak memory,

that gives you a lot of room to decline later on.

Whereas if you're trying to reverse engineer what you don't want to be able to not remember when you're 75, I think you're just setting the bar way too low, right?

So if you're 20, you should be thinking about what are all the sports I can't do?