Chris Rufo
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
That's absolutely right. I mean, these are intelligence officials that should, in theory, be focused on foreign activities. adversaries, but they are very concerned about domestic politics. And so it's not just about their hormones, their genital surgeries. They have vitriolic feelings towards conservatives in particular.
That's absolutely right. I mean, these are intelligence officials that should, in theory, be focused on foreign activities. adversaries, but they are very concerned about domestic politics. And so it's not just about their hormones, their genital surgeries. They have vitriolic feelings towards conservatives in particular.
That's absolutely right. I mean, these are intelligence officials that should, in theory, be focused on foreign activities. adversaries, but they are very concerned about domestic politics. And so it's not just about their hormones, their genital surgeries. They have vitriolic feelings towards conservatives in particular.
Two names that came up, of course, were Chaya Raichik of Libs of TikTok fame. and the one and only Ben Shapiro. And they were going ballistic. I mean, they said at one point that you should be expelled for the tribe for constantly spouting hate speech. I'm not a rabbi. I don't know exactly how that works. But my impression is that the NSA does not have that power. That's something of an overreach.
Two names that came up, of course, were Chaya Raichik of Libs of TikTok fame. and the one and only Ben Shapiro. And they were going ballistic. I mean, they said at one point that you should be expelled for the tribe for constantly spouting hate speech. I'm not a rabbi. I don't know exactly how that works. But my impression is that the NSA does not have that power. That's something of an overreach.
Two names that came up, of course, were Chaya Raichik of Libs of TikTok fame. and the one and only Ben Shapiro. And they were going ballistic. I mean, they said at one point that you should be expelled for the tribe for constantly spouting hate speech. I'm not a rabbi. I don't know exactly how that works. But my impression is that the NSA does not have that power. That's something of an overreach.
And it's frankly quite absurd.
And it's frankly quite absurd.
And it's frankly quite absurd.
Well, the Trump administration is very concerned about this. And just in the last few hours, I can tell you that I've had phone calls and signal messages from not only the NSA, but the CIA and the director of national intelligence staff. And so they want to get to the bottom of this. I'm told that they're going to be taking significant action. And in my view, the standard should be quite simple.
Well, the Trump administration is very concerned about this. And just in the last few hours, I can tell you that I've had phone calls and signal messages from not only the NSA, but the CIA and the director of national intelligence staff. And so they want to get to the bottom of this. I'm told that they're going to be taking significant action. And in my view, the standard should be quite simple.
Well, the Trump administration is very concerned about this. And just in the last few hours, I can tell you that I've had phone calls and signal messages from not only the NSA, but the CIA and the director of national intelligence staff. And so they want to get to the bottom of this. I'm told that they're going to be taking significant action. And in my view, the standard should be quite simple.
If you were at any private corporation, if you worked at Microsoft or you worked at Boeing or ExxonMobil, if you were doing this in the work chat, you would be packed up and gone within hours. The same standard should be applied here. And in fact, it should be even a more stringent standard because revealing these perks,
If you were at any private corporation, if you worked at Microsoft or you worked at Boeing or ExxonMobil, if you were doing this in the work chat, you would be packed up and gone within hours. The same standard should be applied here. And in fact, it should be even a more stringent standard because revealing these perks,
If you were at any private corporation, if you worked at Microsoft or you worked at Boeing or ExxonMobil, if you were doing this in the work chat, you would be packed up and gone within hours. The same standard should be applied here. And in fact, it should be even a more stringent standard because revealing these perks,
personal details, these gory situations, not only is inappropriate at work, but it creates a counterintelligence vulnerability that we know China, Russia, Iran, and other countries would love to exploit.
personal details, these gory situations, not only is inappropriate at work, but it creates a counterintelligence vulnerability that we know China, Russia, Iran, and other countries would love to exploit.
personal details, these gory situations, not only is inappropriate at work, but it creates a counterintelligence vulnerability that we know China, Russia, Iran, and other countries would love to exploit.
That's exactly right. All of these chats that were extremely graphic in nature were legitimized and considered part of the DEI programs. The left wants to play this Mott and Bailey game, this hard debate, easy debate game, where they say, you have to protect people's identity, they just want to have trans people have the right to exist, all of these euphemisms that they use.
That's exactly right. All of these chats that were extremely graphic in nature were legitimized and considered part of the DEI programs. The left wants to play this Mott and Bailey game, this hard debate, easy debate game, where they say, you have to protect people's identity, they just want to have trans people have the right to exist, all of these euphemisms that they use.