Chuck Todd

One of where she's accused of basically stealing COVID money and using it for her campaign.

Right.

You're you're trying to get a why, because you're it's more than just the information you're looking to understand.

She had the public trial with the ethics committee.

So it is certainly politically convenient for both parties and for a Jeffries and a Johnson to almost agree to this and just sort of saying, let the will of the house happen.

Well, how did we get to this position?

You're trying to get more information, more context.

You're not there just for the what.

So you're already a pretty well-informed person.

Whatever happens, happens.

And they clean it up.

So you're then if they're coming to you, you're there.

I will just say this.

The law of unintended consequences.

One.

Your job or my job is to add more context to the situation.

If the votes fail, and they might, there might be other members of Congress who think there but for the grace of God go I, and who may think they're going to practice their own version of the golden rule, and they're going to do unto others what they hope will be done unto them.

And if they fear that they've got something in their past that could come out, what precedent do they want to set?

So you could have some of that.

You could have some of it in the other way where the news of Swalwell and Gonzalez and Mills triggers even more accusations and more staffers decide if we're gonna hold these four accountable, then we need to hold these other folks accountable.