Chuck Todd

Should we do this?

Or is it just certain members doing it?

They were involved.

It was China.

It was so-called the P5 plus one.

But I think I'd like to see that.

So it was...

I bet you you get a bipartisan, but you'd be quickly become a bipartisan caucus, you know, sort of how to remodel the democracy.

It had the potential to be durable, and it was giving Iran an opportunity to prove that its sovereignty should be respected and that they were not the evil incarnate that many of us thought that regime actually was and has turned out to be on that front.

So...

I think it's going to be hard to judge whether tearing up the deal is going to be viewed as a catastrophic mistake because it accelerated this moment, right?

If this moment leads to a better Iran, then I think you know where the debate's going to settle.

Yeah, no, it's a,

that that's a that's a i totally understand how um that works out to be the case but yeah we appreciate you having me on you give me more no this was great i want to you know the next time if you've got a new thing you're to do any if you get this caucus started whatever it is i want to do this again sounds great

If this moment leads to a vacuum that looks more like a rock over the next 20 years, then

I think that that debate about getting out of the deal will be still a pretty highly relevant debate.

When you say a bribery scandal involving an Illinois senator, I have to ask which one you're referring to.

Michael T. from Chicago writes, Hey, I enjoyed your thoughts on who exactly should be considered a founding father, but I couldn't help but notice you completely ignored the Articles of Confederation.

I don't mean to ignore it, but yes, I did.

While that Constitution didn't last terribly long, it was still the governing document of our nation, and everyone seems to forget it existed.