Chuck Todd

I'm disappointed that they've all given up on having robust news divisions.

That's a bummer.

You know, the more that voters care, the more that those of us in elected office have to do something about it.

But you know what?

There's enough demand for one that we're going to.

And in some ways, we're better off building one that's truly independent.

Having one that is blessed by, you know, that still is at the whims of a CEO and shareholders is probably quite dangerous and probably one that we ought to not have.

Right.

There shouldn't be a news organization where you say, well, that's a Murdoch news organization.

That's an Ellison news organization.

That's a Soros news organization.

No, we need something that's truly independent.

That doesn't feel like it owes anybody anything.

And I would also say that whether it's 500,000 or 400,000 –

And so in that respect, I feel like some of you are going to say, boy, did David just – is he a planted question from Scottsdale?

The barriers are more construction.

Like we probably need another office.

We could do that.

There's space on the mall.

No, you're not a planted question, but you did.