Chuck

So the montage could have happened for sure. If you are Team Richard, they will likely say, man, there's no way he would have been fool enough to do that. He didn't kill those guys. Maybe he moved them up to the north and hid them away because he wanted them to be safe or something. But Richard never said anything about it.

So the montage could have happened for sure. If you are Team Richard, they will likely say, man, there's no way he would have been fool enough to do that. He didn't kill those guys. Maybe he moved them up to the north and hid them away because he wanted them to be safe or something. But Richard never said anything about it.

There was no evidence for centuries, like literal evidence tying anything there. But fairly recently, there was a British TV historian that discovered a will that included a necklace that belonged to Edward V, the boy who would be king.

There was no evidence for centuries, like literal evidence tying anything there. But fairly recently, there was a British TV historian that discovered a will that included a necklace that belonged to Edward V, the boy who would be king.

There was no evidence for centuries, like literal evidence tying anything there. But fairly recently, there was a British TV historian that discovered a will that included a necklace that belonged to Edward V, the boy who would be king.

This will was drawn up 33 years after he disappeared, and it belonged to a wealthy London widow named Margaret Capel, who just so happened to be the sister-in-law of that henchman, James Turrell. So the man who either possibly murdered those two guys, or at least was in on the plot, ended up with this necklace that was given to his wife 33 years later.

This will was drawn up 33 years after he disappeared, and it belonged to a wealthy London widow named Margaret Capel, who just so happened to be the sister-in-law of that henchman, James Turrell. So the man who either possibly murdered those two guys, or at least was in on the plot, ended up with this necklace that was given to his wife 33 years later.

This will was drawn up 33 years after he disappeared, and it belonged to a wealthy London widow named Margaret Capel, who just so happened to be the sister-in-law of that henchman, James Turrell. So the man who either possibly murdered those two guys, or at least was in on the plot, ended up with this necklace that was given to his wife 33 years later.

So it's not like, hey, this is literal evidence, but it's pretty shady.

So it's not like, hey, this is literal evidence, but it's pretty shady.

So it's not like, hey, this is literal evidence, but it's pretty shady.

Yeah, I mean, one reason is just that history wasn't recorded the same and there's just a lot of stuff that wasn't noted at the time, right?

Yeah, I mean, one reason is just that history wasn't recorded the same and there's just a lot of stuff that wasn't noted at the time, right?

Yeah, I mean, one reason is just that history wasn't recorded the same and there's just a lot of stuff that wasn't noted at the time, right?

Yeah, for sure. And that's, you know, that's why people still debate this stuff today. And there's, you know, pro-Richard team and anti-Richard team. As far as his rule, he only ruled for a couple of years from 1483 to 1485. And this is, again, where people will debate what kind of king he is, because some people... We'll say that, you know, he fought for the rights of the poor.

Yeah, for sure. And that's, you know, that's why people still debate this stuff today. And there's, you know, pro-Richard team and anti-Richard team. As far as his rule, he only ruled for a couple of years from 1483 to 1485. And this is, again, where people will debate what kind of king he is, because some people... We'll say that, you know, he fought for the rights of the poor.

Yeah, for sure. And that's, you know, that's why people still debate this stuff today. And there's, you know, pro-Richard team and anti-Richard team. As far as his rule, he only ruled for a couple of years from 1483 to 1485. And this is, again, where people will debate what kind of king he is, because some people... We'll say that, you know, he fought for the rights of the poor.

He only convened one parliament that he used to pursue like some pretty progressive agendas for the time, like presumption of innocence was created under his watch.

He only convened one parliament that he used to pursue like some pretty progressive agendas for the time, like presumption of innocence was created under his watch.

He only convened one parliament that he used to pursue like some pretty progressive agendas for the time, like presumption of innocence was created under his watch.