Corey DeAngelis

It was a very good study, the first of its kind. Long-term data, student-level data, very rigorous study. One of the reviewers in one of the first places we sent it was a journal called Urban Education. One of the reviewers said, you know, we like the methods and we buy that it's a causal relationship, but they said, you called the students urban students. You can't say that.

It was a very good study, the first of its kind. Long-term data, student-level data, very rigorous study. One of the reviewers in one of the first places we sent it was a journal called Urban Education. One of the reviewers said, you know, we like the methods and we buy that it's a causal relationship, but they said, you called the students urban students. You can't say that.

It was a very good study, the first of its kind. Long-term data, student-level data, very rigorous study. One of the reviewers in one of the first places we sent it was a journal called Urban Education. One of the reviewers said, you know, we like the methods and we buy that it's a causal relationship, but they said, you called the students urban students. You can't say that.

They are students in urban areas. So it was like a politically correct thing. And I looked at their about the journal. The only reason we said that was because they said urban students in their own about the journal, total hypocrites on the issue. Why were they allowed to say it? But I wasn't allowed to say it, but they went further than that. They also said that

They are students in urban areas. So it was like a politically correct thing. And I looked at their about the journal. The only reason we said that was because they said urban students in their own about the journal, total hypocrites on the issue. Why were they allowed to say it? But I wasn't allowed to say it, but they went further than that. They also said that

They are students in urban areas. So it was like a politically correct thing. And I looked at their about the journal. The only reason we said that was because they said urban students in their own about the journal, total hypocrites on the issue. Why were they allowed to say it? But I wasn't allowed to say it, but they went further than that. They also said that

we have to reject this because you didn't talk about how the results relate to whiteness, structural oppression, and power. I mean, it's just so ridiculous. But the study I wanted to bring up about competition was actually in my home state of Texas. I did a survey experiment with my co-authors. So I randomly assigned different surveys to public school leaders in Texas. And one of the

we have to reject this because you didn't talk about how the results relate to whiteness, structural oppression, and power. I mean, it's just so ridiculous. But the study I wanted to bring up about competition was actually in my home state of Texas. I did a survey experiment with my co-authors. So I randomly assigned different surveys to public school leaders in Texas. And one of the

we have to reject this because you didn't talk about how the results relate to whiteness, structural oppression, and power. I mean, it's just so ridiculous. But the study I wanted to bring up about competition was actually in my home state of Texas. I did a survey experiment with my co-authors. So I randomly assigned different surveys to public school leaders in Texas. And one of the

The treatment group had a randomized note that said on one of the questions, you're going to have a new charter school that's expected to open nearby. And I was asking them where they were going to put their money next year, like where were they going to allocate resources?

The treatment group had a randomized note that said on one of the questions, you're going to have a new charter school that's expected to open nearby. And I was asking them where they were going to put their money next year, like where were they going to allocate resources?

The treatment group had a randomized note that said on one of the questions, you're going to have a new charter school that's expected to open nearby. And I was asking them where they were going to put their money next year, like where were they going to allocate resources?

And the treatment of having a charter school competing with you had the effect of reducing administrative allocations and having more of that money going to the classroom. Okay. Any idea why? Well, because they know that they might have to think about where they're going to spend money if they have a competitor, because if they waste the money, families are going to go there.

And the treatment of having a charter school competing with you had the effect of reducing administrative allocations and having more of that money going to the classroom. Okay. Any idea why? Well, because they know that they might have to think about where they're going to spend money if they have a competitor, because if they waste the money, families are going to go there.

And the treatment of having a charter school competing with you had the effect of reducing administrative allocations and having more of that money going to the classroom. Okay. Any idea why? Well, because they know that they might have to think about where they're going to spend money if they have a competitor, because if they waste the money, families are going to go there.

That's what they tell you publicly, but privately they know that's all BS, which is what that study, because they didn't know what the study was doing. They just thought, I'm answering a simple survey question. And they didn't know whether they were the treatment group or not.

That's what they tell you publicly, but privately they know that's all BS, which is what that study, because they didn't know what the study was doing. They just thought, I'm answering a simple survey question. And they didn't know whether they were the treatment group or not.

That's what they tell you publicly, but privately they know that's all BS, which is what that study, because they didn't know what the study was doing. They just thought, I'm answering a simple survey question. And they didn't know whether they were the treatment group or not.

Yeah, peer-reviewed. Yeah, well, over what period of time? Other ones that weren't peer-reviewed, but I almost think peer-review is a negative indicator at this point because of the peers that are looking at your study.

Yeah, peer-reviewed. Yeah, well, over what period of time? Other ones that weren't peer-reviewed, but I almost think peer-review is a negative indicator at this point because of the peers that are looking at your study.