Corey DeAngelis

She knows this is not going to cut it.

And Votie Bauckham said it best, we cannot continue to send our children to Caesar for their education and be surprised when they come home as Romans.

The good news is parents aren't as surprised anymore and the genie is never going to be put back in the bottle.

We can't unsee what we saw through Zoom school and now we have social media, people going viral for injecting politics into schools.

you know this isn't just happening in blue states it's in red states as well and parents aren't having it anymore and i'd go even further to say that the public school system in its current form discriminates in particular against all families but especially against religious families because they say they can't be religious but if you're religious and you want that kind of upbringing you almost don't have a choice you have to send your kid to a private christian school or another type of religion and you're forced to pay twice there's actually a

an argument to be made that the public school system is a violation of your 14th amendment rights and i'd take it a step further and so did uh phil hamburger a professor in the wall street journal the other uh it was a few years ago where he even took it a step further and said

The public school system violates your First Amendment rights because it's a form of compelled government speech.

So if you want to get a good grade in that school system, you basically have to regurgitate what the leftist teacher tells you.

Your taxpayers are forced to fund it even if they disagree with what's being taught in the school.

And so the only way out –

if we're going to have a publicly provided education or at least taxpayer-funded education, is to allow the money to follow the child to a school that's aligned with their values.

So then you're not infringing on anybody's rights.

You can make an argument that the taxpayer still might be upset if they don't have children, but it's still a huge step in the right direction of saying, look, we'll still fund an education for the public.

And we'll do that through taxes and we won't change that.

But instead of forcing everybody into this one silo and getting what basically nobody wants, everybody can get a little bit of what they do want if you have the money following the child.

And so that could be a public school if you're crazy and want to still send your kid there.

but if not you can you can send them to a private school even a religious school and one thing you know we do this with pre-k too i mentioned other programs with pre-k we have the federal head start program which democrats support and you can use that money at a religious pre-k it's the private providers the money follows the decision of the parent and so why not do that with k through 12. why would you be supportive of it for kit for pre-k

And then you'd also support the money following the student for college.

But then all of a sudden, when you hit kindergarten, when you go from three to four years old,

all of a sudden becomes a big problem.