Corey Noles

Which is not good.

I wonder if some type of, you know, data segregation or on-demand access that isn't constant could play a role in that in the future because it's a really interesting line you have to balance there between what we want it to have and what it has in order to be able to access this information because usually that access extends further.

Even a legal perspective, if you're in, say, health care or education, maybe, you know, where certain data is protected.

I'd say it's probably the same principle that applies if you own a trucking company and you own a truck and you hire a driver and send them out into the world in that and a problem happens.

That's your problem for not taking good care of your truck, for not doing essential maintenance, for not...

You know, keeping it licensed and inspected and insured and making sure, which probably just came up with four new industries that'll find a way to circle in here, I'm sure.

Your AI insurance.

Yeah.

I think the only thing I would add into that list is that I really think the ability to critically think is going to be a little extra important compared to where we have been.

And largely because I think that's an element where there will be some struggles and the ability to not just use AI, but to understand how it fits into the puzzle and be able to really problem solve your way through some of what's around the corner.

That's great stuff, though.

It sure was.

Yeah, that's a good question.

And I think it leads us well into governance, too, because, you know, just like in other ways, governance costs money.

What would you say is the minimum viable set of guardrails that any organization needs right now so savings aren't wiped out by scandals from AIs across the way?

That's a good call out.

Really good call out.

That's a good call.

And it basically shifts a lot of the risk back to the vendor instead of the consumer.

Yeah, because now you're shouldering the burden and cost of a dud.