Craig Horlbeck

And now to watch all of his movies where he's got all this frustration and regret and anger about the way that his dad like a quote unquote abandoned them. But that isn't actually what happened. It puts such a strange lens on all these movies because like when you're a kid, you think you know what's going on with your parents. You have no idea. You have no clue what's really between them.

And now to watch all of his movies where he's got all this frustration and regret and anger about the way that his dad like a quote unquote abandoned them. But that isn't actually what happened. It puts such a strange lens on all these movies because like when you're a kid, you think you know what's going on with your parents. You have no idea. You have no clue what's really between them.

And now to watch all of his movies where he's got all this frustration and regret and anger about the way that his dad like a quote unquote abandoned them. But that isn't actually what happened. It puts such a strange lens on all these movies because like when you're a kid, you think you know what's going on with your parents. You have no idea. You have no clue what's really between them.

And so for him to be like processing this for 30 years of the most popular movies of all time is so interesting. You agree with that?

And so for him to be like processing this for 30 years of the most popular movies of all time is so interesting. You agree with that?

And so for him to be like processing this for 30 years of the most popular movies of all time is so interesting. You agree with that?

And I think that's the best version. I think that's the one that features some new stuff from the 80 version, like the Cotopaxi, the Finding the Ship. Some good edits. It's cleaner. You understand Lacombe and Neary a little bit more than you do in the theatrical cut, but you don't have the spaceship interior, which I don't really get the appeal of that sequence at all. Ebert loves that sequence.

And I think that's the best version. I think that's the one that features some new stuff from the 80 version, like the Cotopaxi, the Finding the Ship. Some good edits. It's cleaner. You understand Lacombe and Neary a little bit more than you do in the theatrical cut, but you don't have the spaceship interior, which I don't really get the appeal of that sequence at all. Ebert loves that sequence.

And I think that's the best version. I think that's the one that features some new stuff from the 80 version, like the Cotopaxi, the Finding the Ship. Some good edits. It's cleaner. You understand Lacombe and Neary a little bit more than you do in the theatrical cut, but you don't have the spaceship interior, which I don't really get the appeal of that sequence at all. Ebert loves that sequence.

I don't get it at all.

I don't get it at all.

I don't get it at all.

I know you did the Book of Basketball 2.0, but is there any part of you that wants to go back to the Book of Basketball? And like take a chapter out, add two more chapters in the middle, redo it.

I know you did the Book of Basketball 2.0, but is there any part of you that wants to go back to the Book of Basketball? And like take a chapter out, add two more chapters in the middle, redo it.

I know you did the Book of Basketball 2.0, but is there any part of you that wants to go back to the Book of Basketball? And like take a chapter out, add two more chapters in the middle, redo it.

Why don't you do it?

Why don't you do it?

Why don't you do it?

Is that the only reason?

Is that the only reason?