Curt Weldon
speaker
629 appearances
3 recordings
2 series
first heard Apr 2025
last heard 18 Aug
Curt Weldon’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Aug 2026 with 1.
Appearances
From the two embassy officials, North Korea had no embassy here. They had a consular office up at the UN. Ambassador Han and Ambassador Park. Ambassador Han called me. He said, Chairman Weldon, you have some kind of a prayer event in Washington once a year. I said, yes, Ambassador. It's the prayer breakfast. He said, Ambassador Park and I would like to come and bring our spouses.
I said, you want to come to the prayer breakfast? He said, yes. I said, well, you know, you can't have a press conference there. It's a prayer breakfast. We pray. He said, no, Congressman, we just want to come and show our presence. Well, I said, absolutely, you'll be my guest. I organized the table.
It was going to be the ambassador from Libby and his wife, Ambassador Hahn and his wife, Ambassador Park and his wife, right in the front and the center of the national prayer breakfast. About two weeks before the prayer breakfast, I got a call from Ambassador Hahn. He was very upset. He said, Congressman Weldon, we have to turn down your offer. I said, why would you do this to me?
You asked me to get the invitation. I get it. I get the table. He said, Congressman, you don't understand. We're not an embassy. For us to travel outside of New York out of 50 miles, we have to get State Department approval. We applied for the permit, and your State Department turned us down. I hung up the phone, and I called the State Department.
And the Congressional Affairs guy, whose name I have in my records, and he'll say this, he'll verify it. Before I could even say anything, he said, Mr. Chairman, I know why you're calling. And Chairman Powell supports you. We were called by the White House and told to deny the approval for the two embassy leaders from North Korea to come with a prayer breakfast.
Condoleezza Rice. She didn't want them in the room. She didn't want to show that North Korea wanted a peaceful coexistence with America. I'll take a polygraph.
They want conflict.
I've never met the woman. I know a lot about directed energy. I was the first person to hold a congressional hearing on EMP. Based on, as you know, and you viewers can Google the term Starfish Prime. That was the first EMP test. If you had Peter Pryor, I know he talked about that. Peter worked for me. When I wrote the EMP legislation, which became law, it created the commission.
Peter was the executive director of the commission. EMP is our gravest threat right now because it can neutralize a country by taking out your smart capabilities. But from that, weapons were developed using directed energy. And that's the major thrust to me today. And what Judith Wood says is that those buildings weren't taken down through airplanes or bombs.
They were taken down through a massive direct energy attack.
First of all, the architecture, I don't compare either one of the two because I'm not a professional in that area. I think they both are credible people. Richard Gage and the 3,000 architects and engineers have risked their entire lives and careers talking about the lies of the NIST and the false report that was put out there.
And I can give you a story about NIST that will blow your viewers away, but I won't bother you if you don't want to hear it.
I think we need this. We need to have a presidential commission get Richard Gage, who's done a lifetime of work, Judith Wood, the firefighters, the lawyers, all of the people. We have firefighters who have never been interviewed who heard explosions in the buildings. All of those people need to come together because the 9-11 Commission, listen carefully, is a complete fraud.
I don't blame the commissioners. I blame the people who manipulated the data, the people who ran it.
Well, I've never met Donald Trump. And I do think he's the only person right now in America that can get us back on a normal track about the way this country was designed when I taught school for seven years in Pennsylvania. My personal bias is I want 9-11 addressed because it is the largest single attack in U.S. history. It's the largest loss of life in our country.
And in my opinion, I don't think it was an accident. I think there was deliberate involvement in what I've seen to cover it up, and I want to know why. With the Epstein case, I've not done an investigation. I think that's probably more of a personal thing. where the deep state may have information on people that they are threatening people with if that comes out.
The key thing for Donald Trump is to take the initiative and be the aggressor and analyze all of those deep state bad people and what they've done. Their bank accounts, what they hold now, their relationships. None of us know any of that and start to expose that. 9-11. Well, not only that, everything they've been involved in.
Those people that have made money that have been caused by the deaths of American GIs and by the deaths of American citizens and firefighters. Donald Trump should take the offensive. That's what I would do.
But also, what people working for a deep state has gone on to make money that is exorbitant cash pots that they hide behind now based upon their ties to our intelligence in the past.
Yep, I saw it.
Showing 381–400 of 629 · page 20 of 32
← Previous
Next →