Curtis Yarvin

So I often find, why don't you just scratch a little at some of the historical... There was no massacre of Huguenots. I think you're confusing it with the Sack of Béziers and the massacre of the Alpagentians. So they got massacred, not the Huguenots. Yeah.

But the thing is, when people look at the Holocaust, they saw like a new species of deviltry that had not really existed in the world in that way before. You know, when you see a city sacked in the Middle Ages, you see just like wild, undisciplined troops like raging around. You don't see like lines of people march to their deaths.

But the thing is, when people look at the Holocaust, they saw like a new species of deviltry that had not really existed in the world in that way before. You know, when you see a city sacked in the Middle Ages, you see just like wild, undisciplined troops like raging around. You don't see like lines of people march to their deaths.

There's two more. There's two more.

There's two more. There's two more.

Let's go. Let's go. Harmony. Let's go. Let's go through each of those examples. And so when you look, for example, at Mandela, the reason I said that most people don't know this. There was a little Contra Thompson when Mandela was released because he actually had to be taken off the terrorist list.

Let's go. Let's go. Harmony. Let's go. Let's go through each of those examples. And so when you look, for example, at Mandela, the reason I said that most people don't know this. There was a little Contra Thompson when Mandela was released because he actually had to be taken off the terrorist list.

He was in the viciously racist apartheid regime. Basically, they had him on the terrorist list. So if you look at— Let's get to the other two.

He was in the viciously racist apartheid regime. Basically, they had him on the terrorist list. So if you look at— Let's get to the other two.

Because they're both terrorists and because they basically both violated the rules of war in the same way. And they both basically killed innocent people. We valorize terrorism all the time. This valorization. So Gandhi then is your model.

Because they're both terrorists and because they basically both violated the rules of war in the same way. And they both basically killed innocent people. We valorize terrorism all the time. This valorization. So Gandhi then is your model.

It's more complicated than that, but I could say things about either. But let's move on to one of your other examples. So I think the best way to basically grapple with that period directly. Which period are we talking about now? 1860s. Okay, yeah. Okay, let's talk about African Americans in the 1860s.

It's more complicated than that, but I could say things about either. But let's move on to one of your other examples. So I think the best way to basically grapple with that period directly. Which period are we talking about now? 1860s. Okay, yeah. Okay, let's talk about African Americans in the 1860s.

Okay, the thing that you can do that any Times reader can do, just go to your Google Bar and Google slave narratives. Just go and read random slave narratives and get their experience of the time. And so the thing is that basically the treatment of—

Okay, the thing that you can do that any Times reader can do, just go to your Google Bar and Google slave narratives. Just go and read random slave narratives and get their experience of the time. And so the thing is that basically the treatment of—

of the freed slaves after the war is like extremely, there was a recent historian who published a thing, and I think this is, I would dispute this, this number is too high, but his estimate was that something like a quarter of all the freedmen basically die in between like 1865 and 1870.

of the freed slaves after the war is like extremely, there was a recent historian who published a thing, and I think this is, I would dispute this, this number is too high, but his estimate was that something like a quarter of all the freedmen basically die in between like 1865 and 1870.

Their children were no longer sold out from under them. When I said anyone, okay, first of all, when I said anyone, I was talking about a population group rather than individuals.

Their children were no longer sold out from under them. When I said anyone, okay, first of all, when I said anyone, I was talking about a population group rather than individuals.

The era of 1865 to 1875 was absolutely, and the war itself wasn't good either. But if you look at the living conditions for an African American in the South, they are absolutely at their nadir between 1865 and 1875. They are very, very bad because basically this economic system has been disrupted.