Dan Brouillette

But he is serious about changing this regime.

But he is serious about changing this regime.

But he is serious about changing this regime.

And your lead in was, I think, exactly correct.

And your lead in was, I think, exactly correct.

And your lead in was, I think, exactly correct.

We saw this in 2017, 2018 and 2019 when we were dealing with what was then known as the JCPOA, which was the

We saw this in 2017, 2018 and 2019 when we were dealing with what was then known as the JCPOA, which was the

We saw this in 2017, 2018 and 2019 when we were dealing with what was then known as the JCPOA, which was the

the Obama construct for reducing their desire to produce nuclear weapons.

the Obama construct for reducing their desire to produce nuclear weapons.

the Obama construct for reducing their desire to produce nuclear weapons.

The tactics used by the regime at that point in time were very similar to what we saw in the last few weeks with Jared and Special Envoy Witkoff.

The tactics used by the regime at that point in time were very similar to what we saw in the last few weeks with Jared and Special Envoy Witkoff.

The tactics used by the regime at that point in time were very similar to what we saw in the last few weeks with Jared and Special Envoy Witkoff.

It's delay, it's slowing things down, it's stringing things along to the point where they think that they're going to have some upper hand in the conversation.

It's delay, it's slowing things down, it's stringing things along to the point where they think that they're going to have some upper hand in the conversation.

It's delay, it's slowing things down, it's stringing things along to the point where they think that they're going to have some upper hand in the conversation.

I think that's what angers the president.

I think that's what angers the president.