Dan Epps

It sort of seems like a fictional justice, and it gave her a crown.

So I don't know what to make of Grok's judicial philosophy based on that.

But then I got another one.

John Elwood, the great John Elwood of Realist Watch, tried this, and he got multiple versions.

So one version removed Justice Gorsuch and put the crown on Justice Jackson.

The other version removed the chief and put a crown on Justice Sotomayor.

So Grok, I thought Grok was going to be kind of based, but Grok, you know, is maybe a lib on judicial methodology.

Hmm.

Elon Musk, yeah, he's going to tweak the algorithm.

Although I don't know if he's weighed in much on judicial methodology outside of the context of Delaware corporate law, which where he is clearly has very strong views because what the Delaware courts do, you know, affects whether he gets like a trillion dollars or not.

Yeah.

Okay, so that was my idle chit-chat.

Let's get to substance.

Limited time.

I've got a faculty meeting.

Okay.

We're going to go briskly, and we're going to talk first about one of the cases decided today that isn't the tariffs case, Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections.

And this is one that's very much in the bowed wheelhouse, right?

Standing case.

Standing election law in the state of Illinois, right?