Dan Epps

Like, yeah, unless.

So are there are there two differences?

One is that the court and Justice Barrett and Justice Kagan

in particular, have the intuition that maybe it's more reasonable to spend the money.

And the other is that the problem that you don't see that here we know who the candidate is.

Yeah.

Right.

These rules affect this candidate's election, whereas in Clapper, you know, the problem was like anybody, you know, anybody could be surveilled.

Right.

You know, and it's more generalized.

Yeah, I think there is a problem that Clapper might not be right.

Okay.

Just Jackson has a dissent, a bit fiery, you know, lots of rhetoric about democracy and how like by, you know, basically I think as I take the point, it's like by saying that candidates have an interest, they're disregarding the fact that it's really you and me as citizens who really have an interest in the outcome of democracy.

Yeah.

So there is a...

But, yeah.

Okay, we wanted to talk about another case.

Is this everything we wanted to say about this one?

Yeah, we're on the eve.

Eve of my faculty meeting.