Dan Epps

Thanks to the Constitutional Law Institute for sponsoring all of our endeavors.

I'm Will Vode. And I'm Dan Epps. So, Will, this is our first live show in a little while. We're here. Where are we? We're in California. California. We're at Stanford Law School at a live show sponsored by an institution that you used to be a participant in. Say more.

I'm Will Vode. And I'm Dan Epps. So, Will, this is our first live show in a little while. We're here. Where are we? We're in California. California. We're at Stanford Law School at a live show sponsored by an institution that you used to be a participant in. Say more.

So hopefully we don't make this the last one. We'll try to do our best to not totally crash and burn. So let's see what happens. So we've got some interesting stuff in store for you. We have an empty mic up here at the podium for a surprise guest. But those of us who are listening, those of you who are listening at home on the podcast, we'll have to just wait and see who that's going to be.

So hopefully we don't make this the last one. We'll try to do our best to not totally crash and burn. So let's see what happens. So we've got some interesting stuff in store for you. We have an empty mic up here at the podium for a surprise guest. But those of us who are listening, those of you who are listening at home on the podcast, we'll have to just wait and see who that's going to be.

So keep listening. But before we do that, what is there to catch up on?

So keep listening. But before we do that, what is there to catch up on?

I did. But I got to say, the opinions are a little short. I didn't totally know what was going on. All right.

I did. But I got to say, the opinions are a little short. I didn't totally know what was going on. All right.

But right now, is that is that happen at the same time? They changed the name from Judicial Crisis Network to Judicial Confirmation Network. You're familiar with that organization?

But right now, is that is that happen at the same time? They changed the name from Judicial Crisis Network to Judicial Confirmation Network. You're familiar with that organization?

So what do you think? Do you think we're finally going to get resolution of this issue in this next administration if the political valence of nationwide injunctions is about to change?

So what do you think? Do you think we're finally going to get resolution of this issue in this next administration if the political valence of nationwide injunctions is about to change?

I don't know. It's just too hard to write the opinion coming up with the narrow rule.

I don't know. It's just too hard to write the opinion coming up with the narrow rule.

And maybe they are relatively rare enough that the court can just review them case by case. They don't mind doing that.

And maybe they are relatively rare enough that the court can just review them case by case. They don't mind doing that.

I mean, sometimes it's nice to be able to just get to weigh in case by case and not have to formulate the rule. If they don't mind doing that, then maybe this is the best outcome for them.

I mean, sometimes it's nice to be able to just get to weigh in case by case and not have to formulate the rule. If they don't mind doing that, then maybe this is the best outcome for them.

Yeah, and so unless you've got anything more to say about that one, maybe we should just briefly talk about the change administration and what that might mean for the court. So as always happens, when there's a change in administration, the government flips its position in some of the cases in which the government has already –