Dan Epps

Tradition. Okay, but why? I would want credit if I was writing this.

I mean sometimes there are cases like that and often those are maybe argued cases, right? But here where a case is just sort of plucked from obscurity, it's presuming because someone on the court found it particularly compelling. Yes. Right? Don't you think in a lot of these kind of summary reversal type cases, someone files a petition and someone on the court,

I mean sometimes there are cases like that and often those are maybe argued cases, right? But here where a case is just sort of plucked from obscurity, it's presuming because someone on the court found it particularly compelling. Yes. Right? Don't you think in a lot of these kind of summary reversal type cases, someone files a petition and someone on the court,

you know, gets motivated and says, you know, I think something, this court below got it really wrong, I know it's not, the kind of thing on which we would normally grant cert. It's a little fact bound. It's error correction. But I want to take this for a few weeks, try to write an opinion, see if I can get everybody on board.

you know, gets motivated and says, you know, I think something, this court below got it really wrong, I know it's not, the kind of thing on which we would normally grant cert. It's a little fact bound. It's error correction. But I want to take this for a few weeks, try to write an opinion, see if I can get everybody on board.

And do you understand the way the docker works? So it seems to be getting both relisted and rescheduled. Yeah. It's getting distributed, then rescheduled, distributed, then rescheduled. This is spring of 2024. Yeah. What's going on when that happens? Sometimes you just see relist, relist, relist, relist. This is relist, reschedule, which are not the same thing, right?

And do you understand the way the docker works? So it seems to be getting both relisted and rescheduled. Yeah. It's getting distributed, then rescheduled, distributed, then rescheduled. This is spring of 2024. Yeah. What's going on when that happens? Sometimes you just see relist, relist, relist, relist. This is relist, reschedule, which are not the same thing, right?

But it seemed like it plausibly could have been. Sure. But I really don't know. I mean, did you have a – nothing in the opinion really set off my radar in terms of recognizing someone's distinctive style. Yeah.

But it seemed like it plausibly could have been. Sure. But I really don't know. I mean, did you have a – nothing in the opinion really set off my radar in terms of recognizing someone's distinctive style. Yeah.

Is there some reason to think that or are they just saying, well, this is a case about a woman and therefore she would have been concerned about the gender angle or something like that? Is that really the – I think it's that.

Is there some reason to think that or are they just saying, well, this is a case about a woman and therefore she would have been concerned about the gender angle or something like that? Is that really the – I think it's that.

Do you buy that theory or – if I said – tell me who you think it is. We know it's not Justice Alito because he concurs in the judgment and sort of says, well, I'm – go along. But basically he's trying to say, I don't think this person should win below. I agree that this principle is established. Yeah.

Do you buy that theory or – if I said – tell me who you think it is. We know it's not Justice Alito because he concurs in the judgment and sort of says, well, I'm – go along. But basically he's trying to say, I don't think this person should win below. I agree that this principle is established. Yeah.

OK. Just to mix it up or do you have – do you have some basis for that or are you just trying to be provocative?

OK. Just to mix it up or do you have – do you have some basis for that or are you just trying to be provocative?

Just moving him. Don't you think he'd want credit for that, for showing maybe he cares about these issues? Maybe. Okay. Maybe he left a tell. Yeah. So I tried to get – Did you read the first letter of each paragraph? I didn't. I did – the other day I tried to get – Claude.ai, you used that one.

Just moving him. Don't you think he'd want credit for that, for showing maybe he cares about these issues? Maybe. Okay. Maybe he left a tell. Yeah. So I tried to get – Did you read the first letter of each paragraph? I didn't. I did – the other day I tried to get – Claude.ai, you used that one.

I think you're deeper into generative AI than people might have assumed because you're not always the tech-savviest member of this podcast. But you've got a couple of subscriptions, right?

I think you're deeper into generative AI than people might have assumed because you're not always the tech-savviest member of this podcast. But you've got a couple of subscriptions, right?

Yeah, I tried to get Claude to analyze Procurium to tell me. who wrote it, and it refused. It seemed to violate its ethical principles. Yeah, I really don't know why. He said it would be improper for it to speculate. I'm sure there's a way I could have kind of negotiated with it to trick it into doing that, but I just, I don't have the time. I got to try this. I'll try this and we'll update it.