Dan Hollaway

Yeah. Well, there's so there's two major cases on this. States versus Klein from 1872 and then Ex parte Garland in 1866. And both courts affirmed that once a pardon is issued, it's issued unless you can prove fraud, which is what they may try to do. But I don't I just don't see how you do it. Yeah. Like, how do you prove

Yeah. Well, there's so there's two major cases on this. States versus Klein from 1872 and then Ex parte Garland in 1866. And both courts affirmed that once a pardon is issued, it's issued unless you can prove fraud, which is what they may try to do. But I don't I just don't see how you do it. Yeah. Like, how do you prove

Yeah. Well, there's so there's two major cases on this. States versus Klein from 1872 and then Ex parte Garland in 1866. And both courts affirmed that once a pardon is issued, it's issued unless you can prove fraud, which is what they may try to do. But I don't I just don't see how you do it. Yeah. Like, how do you prove

It's an impossible case to make, to be honest, because unless somebody like even. Even if everybody that worked for Biden testified that he was mentally out of it, right? You can't prove that he was on that specific moment, right? That's what matters. So I don't see that going anywhere, to be honest. I think this is just a publicity stunt.

It's an impossible case to make, to be honest, because unless somebody like even. Even if everybody that worked for Biden testified that he was mentally out of it, right? You can't prove that he was on that specific moment, right? That's what matters. So I don't see that going anywhere, to be honest. I think this is just a publicity stunt.

It's an impossible case to make, to be honest, because unless somebody like even. Even if everybody that worked for Biden testified that he was mentally out of it, right? You can't prove that he was on that specific moment, right? That's what matters. So I don't see that going anywhere, to be honest. I think this is just a publicity stunt.

Yeah, the smarter move would be to subpoena these people. Subpoena Fauci and start asking him questions because he can't be charged with anything that he did while in government because of this pardon. But every time he lies under oath, he can be charged with contempt of Congress, which you can, you know, it's three years and $30,000 fine. You just keep doing that over and over.

Yeah, the smarter move would be to subpoena these people. Subpoena Fauci and start asking him questions because he can't be charged with anything that he did while in government because of this pardon. But every time he lies under oath, he can be charged with contempt of Congress, which you can, you know, it's three years and $30,000 fine. You just keep doing that over and over.

Yeah, the smarter move would be to subpoena these people. Subpoena Fauci and start asking him questions because he can't be charged with anything that he did while in government because of this pardon. But every time he lies under oath, he can be charged with contempt of Congress, which you can, you know, it's three years and $30,000 fine. You just keep doing that over and over.

Keep him in there a couple days until he racks up 100 years and then throw his ass in prison for the rest of his life. I mean, that's how they do it. And he can't use the Fifth Amendment. Well, they do it indirectly, bro.

Keep him in there a couple days until he racks up 100 years and then throw his ass in prison for the rest of his life. I mean, that's how they do it. And he can't use the Fifth Amendment. Well, they do it indirectly, bro.

Keep him in there a couple days until he racks up 100 years and then throw his ass in prison for the rest of his life. I mean, that's how they do it. And he can't use the Fifth Amendment. Well, they do it indirectly, bro.

No, no, no. He can't do it. No, they do things like I don't recall. Well, then that would be a crime as well, right? That would be a crime of omission. It's still a crime. So once you receive a pardon, the Fifth Amendment no longer applies because you can't be convicted.

No, no, no. He can't do it. No, they do things like I don't recall. Well, then that would be a crime as well, right? That would be a crime of omission. It's still a crime. So once you receive a pardon, the Fifth Amendment no longer applies because you can't be convicted.

No, no, no. He can't do it. No, they do things like I don't recall. Well, then that would be a crime as well, right? That would be a crime of omission. It's still a crime. So once you receive a pardon, the Fifth Amendment no longer applies because you can't be convicted.

No. uh if you could be proved that he does recall if i could show him evidence like hey here's your signature on something you don't recall signing this i don't recall like well here it is here's the evidence did you do it or not well yes i did all right there good now you've said it force that force these people to say this that they did out loud dude listen real talk

No. uh if you could be proved that he does recall if i could show him evidence like hey here's your signature on something you don't recall signing this i don't recall like well here it is here's the evidence did you do it or not well yes i did all right there good now you've said it force that force these people to say this that they did out loud dude listen real talk

No. uh if you could be proved that he does recall if i could show him evidence like hey here's your signature on something you don't recall signing this i don't recall like well here it is here's the evidence did you do it or not well yes i did all right there good now you've said it force that force these people to say this that they did out loud dude listen real talk

Well, maybe not, but Biden just set a precedent. Nobody's ever given a preemptive pardon before.

Well, maybe not, but Biden just set a precedent. Nobody's ever given a preemptive pardon before.