Dan Nottingham

Don't try to make it lean one way or the other.

Just find out what's true.

Well, I shouldn't say true.

What's credible isn't true.

And by spread by averaging out all the biases as much as we could, we believe that was a way of being as ethical as we could with this, not to support any particular worldview.

That's it.

So we do have a prompt that we built into it, but it says things like the prompt includes statements like you do not take a political stance on anything.

You are to be an unbiased judge.

We try to tell it what it is and what it's trying to do.

So we've built all that into it to try to be as neutral as we can.

All you have to do is put in a statement and it evaluates it.

What we see as the future is a place where credibility is.

and trust is kind of built into the system.

So right now you think of, uh, uh, social media platforms, information spreads through interactions with it, right?

Positive or negative.

We want to see, or we see being added in the future that credibility, something with a high credibility and high interaction spreads with something with maybe a lot of interactions, but a low credibility, uh,

doesn't spread as much.

It's frothed.

Now, that doesn't mean that we tell you what to think or that we try to stifle free speech.

It's just a matter of being like a responsible editor.