Dan Pfeiffer

The other one is that they would use the Defense Production Act to seize control of Anthropic's AI model.

Now, those things are in complete conflict with each other.

If you are subject to a Defense Production Authorities Act acquisition, it's because what you have is so essential to national security, the government needs it right now.

And the other one in the blacklisting is that you're so dangerous that no one who does business with you can be in contact with the government.

I don't know that consistency is what they're going for.

This is the future we are living in.

I don't think any of these AI companies are covered in glory.

Anthropic

to their, I would say, limited, to their credit in this instance.

But Anthropic exists.

And I just read an incredible book about this called Emperor of AI.

Anthropics, which is about OpenAI.

But Anthropics exists because the CEO and the heads of Anthropic and that team left OpenAI because they thought Sam Altman was abandoning the original mission of OpenAI, which was to guard against risk.

Now, they have also commercialized and are running a $380 billion company right now.

there are a lot of other people who are going to do like Elon fucking Musk are going to do the things that Anthropic will not do.

The people who gave them $380 billion probably hope they care about making money.

And with statutes, with legislation.

Like, yes, the administration, whose current philosophy is no regulations at all, and they're trying to ban regulations at the state level.

But Congress needs to get involved here.

And that is dangerous because most of them are still using their AOL accounts.