Dan Turner

So conversely, lithium markets are going to see this and say, wow, the future is really bright.

The future is shifting, and that will have a huge impact on pricing as well.

Oh, 100%.

And they will try to reverse this if the White House flips Democrat in 2028.

And this will be a campaign speech, right?

And mostly because it's funded by those who have interests in overseas lithium.

Tom Steyer is one of the largest, his hedge fund is one of the largest investors in overseas mining.

And yet he will run on a green platform and say, we need to have no coal in America.

Those same forces will come out opposed to this and say, we can't have a lithium mine.

What about the climate?

What about the environmental impact?

But they are funded by groups that have foreign investment interests.

Not at all.

Not at all.

Similarly, go back to 2015 and 16.

Now, this was proven by the House Committee on Science.

The majority of the social media posts on fracking and banning fracking were paid for by the Russians because they did not want fracking to take place in America.

They knew Donald Trump would expand fracking.

And that's bad for their market share.

So foreign interests have always co-opted the environmental movement.