Daniel Oblak

Yeah.

And it's a good question because I also don't want to be dismissive.

I mean, people have experiences that, again, I can't really comment on because, first of all, when we talk about aura, well, what is that?

I can't find a scientific definition of it.

And I think there's a lot of different ways that people perceive that.

And I would rather stick to, you know, this is what we see.

What we're seeing does not generally fit what I hear people describe as aura.

I mean, you can't perceive it

It's too weak to be perceived.

It's not a halo around you.

It's like looking at an image of the person.

If you look at the mice that we have in our paper, I mean, you can see the outline of them.

It's basically like a faint glow from them.

So I would say, you know, I can refer to and explain what we're seeing in the physical domain, and I will leave others to try and see what they believe that they see as a separate thing.

Well, I mean, this is interesting, right?

Because it is a non-invasive.

So you don't actually, way of looking at biological samples, you're not seeing, you're probing them or prodding them.

You're just looking at it.

It is very faint and it does not transmit very well through tissue.

So you can all kind of see the surface of you.