Daniel P. Driscoll

And we are going to try to be able to manufacture the vast majority of that in our own nation.

I think nearly every time I've been in the White House, I have heard the president and his team focused on bringing peace there.

I think he rightfully says that war is...

is a tragedy on a global scale he is working to bring those two parties together to find peace and i am optimistic that under his leadership he will be able to do it i want to stress though that i think this is back to that media narrative when people blame him for this it's insanity to me that he's the only leader in the world i think that would be capable

of if you had told me that the war concluded next week, I would believe it would be true under his leadership, where I think nearly any other individual just couldn't bring those two parties to the table and get them to come to a place of agreement.

And so I don't know what it ends up looking like.

I don't think anybody does.

But I think if you listen to what is occurring and you listen to how the parties are speaking about it, I think their respect for the president and the respect for our country increases the odds of it being done.

sooner rather than later, which again, this was now my second politician answer, is a little bit mushy and a little bit like of a sidestep.

But I think on this one, no one knows is probably the short answer.

You're hitting all the hot topics at the end.

That's what we're here for.

Yeah, I get it.

So this next remark is not meant to be trite.

It's not.

I think any of your listeners, I think you'd feel the same.

Anyone who's deployed to a war of any scale, it fucking sucks.

Like, war is hell.

I think the negative externalities, the civilians that die in these instances,

is just a catastrophic outcome that has existed since the beginning of mankind when people go to war.