Danny Savalos

So there is a bit of theater involved, and it does help. If the jurors think, hey, this is somebody that's diligent, he cares about his case, the optics of him handing over notes may be much better than the actual substance of the notes that he's handing over.

So there is a bit of theater involved, and it does help. If the jurors think, hey, this is somebody that's diligent, he cares about his case, the optics of him handing over notes may be much better than the actual substance of the notes that he's handing over.

Here's what didn't happen. I can virtually guarantee it. What didn't happen is that the lawyer, Bach, was retained last night and looked at the file for the first time last night. That's impossible. Probably more likely, this was a strategic choice. I'm sure the attorney was prepping for weeks, if not months.

Here's what didn't happen. I can virtually guarantee it. What didn't happen is that the lawyer, Bach, was retained last night and looked at the file for the first time last night. That's impossible. Probably more likely, this was a strategic choice. I'm sure the attorney was prepping for weeks, if not months.

Here's what didn't happen. I can virtually guarantee it. What didn't happen is that the lawyer, Bach, was retained last night and looked at the file for the first time last night. That's impossible. Probably more likely, this was a strategic choice. I'm sure the attorney was prepping for weeks, if not months.

and just entered his appearance last night or whenever it was, maybe that was even part of the strategy to keep him under the radar. But more likely than not, this is an attorney with extensive experience cross-examining witnesses like this. And, you know, Andrea, I've used memory witnesses, experts in psychology. This is a particularly complicated area of expertise.

and just entered his appearance last night or whenever it was, maybe that was even part of the strategy to keep him under the radar. But more likely than not, this is an attorney with extensive experience cross-examining witnesses like this. And, you know, Andrea, I've used memory witnesses, experts in psychology. This is a particularly complicated area of expertise.

and just entered his appearance last night or whenever it was, maybe that was even part of the strategy to keep him under the radar. But more likely than not, this is an attorney with extensive experience cross-examining witnesses like this. And, you know, Andrea, I've used memory witnesses, experts in psychology. This is a particularly complicated area of expertise.

Well, we thought he might today and then that got pushed off. But that is not unusual in trials. By the way, it could be that it wasn't Kid Cudi's schedule. It might have been one of the witnesses from today. We really don't know. This kind of thing happens all the time.

Well, we thought he might today and then that got pushed off. But that is not unusual in trials. By the way, it could be that it wasn't Kid Cudi's schedule. It might have been one of the witnesses from today. We really don't know. This kind of thing happens all the time.

Well, we thought he might today and then that got pushed off. But that is not unusual in trials. By the way, it could be that it wasn't Kid Cudi's schedule. It might have been one of the witnesses from today. We really don't know. This kind of thing happens all the time.

She was just claiming that her constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated. Plus, racketeering 101.

She was just claiming that her constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated. Plus, racketeering 101.

Instead of just charging with a federal-based sex crime, the key to the RICO allegations is that there's an organization involved.

Instead of just charging with a federal-based sex crime, the key to the RICO allegations is that there's an organization involved.

Hi, Andrea.

Hi, Andrea.

Donna's defense attorney withdrew from the case literally on the eve of the trial last September, citing a conflict of interest. He represented Donna's son, Charlie, who was convicted of Dan Markell's murder in 2023.

Donna's defense attorney withdrew from the case literally on the eve of the trial last September, citing a conflict of interest. He represented Donna's son, Charlie, who was convicted of Dan Markell's murder in 2023.

It took a while for Donna to find new attorneys, but a trial date was eventually set for next month, only for Donna's defense to ask the judge for another delay, in part because they said the state had opened a new investigation into the case, which was taking up a lot of their time. Wow. What did the judge say to that request?