Danny Savalos

Thank you.

Thank you.

If you don't get that objection in fast enough, the judge may not allow you to even make that objection.

If you don't get that objection in fast enough, the judge may not allow you to even make that objection.

If you don't get that objection in fast enough, the judge may not allow you to even make that objection.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

They are the opposing attorney's way to try and argue against the admissibility of a question or an answer or evidence in general in real time. And if you don't get that objection in fast enough before the answer comes, the judge may not allow you to even make that objection. And if you don't make that objection on the record, you may not be able to raise it on appeals.

They are the opposing attorney's way to try and argue against the admissibility of a question or an answer or evidence in general in real time. And if you don't get that objection in fast enough before the answer comes, the judge may not allow you to even make that objection. And if you don't make that objection on the record, you may not be able to raise it on appeals.

They are the opposing attorney's way to try and argue against the admissibility of a question or an answer or evidence in general in real time. And if you don't get that objection in fast enough before the answer comes, the judge may not allow you to even make that objection. And if you don't make that objection on the record, you may not be able to raise it on appeals.

Well, a lot of times there are objections really to forms of questions. It could be leading. You hear that a lot. You have hearsay. You have relevance, which is always an objection. Even if the evidence is relevant, it might be really prejudicial, and that prejudice outweighs the relevance. You'll hear that objection a lot.

Well, a lot of times there are objections really to forms of questions. It could be leading. You hear that a lot. You have hearsay. You have relevance, which is always an objection. Even if the evidence is relevant, it might be really prejudicial, and that prejudice outweighs the relevance. You'll hear that objection a lot.

Well, a lot of times there are objections really to forms of questions. It could be leading. You hear that a lot. You have hearsay. You have relevance, which is always an objection. Even if the evidence is relevant, it might be really prejudicial, and that prejudice outweighs the relevance. You'll hear that objection a lot.

Yes, the way it works is you say objection, and depending on the judge's practice, ordinarily you will state the basis for your objection. But some judges don't want you to do that because they don't want you to sort of argue in front of the jury. But the attorney who objects should always be ready with the rule of evidence on which the objection is based.

Yes, the way it works is you say objection, and depending on the judge's practice, ordinarily you will state the basis for your objection. But some judges don't want you to do that because they don't want you to sort of argue in front of the jury. But the attorney who objects should always be ready with the rule of evidence on which the objection is based.

Yes, the way it works is you say objection, and depending on the judge's practice, ordinarily you will state the basis for your objection. But some judges don't want you to do that because they don't want you to sort of argue in front of the jury. But the attorney who objects should always be ready with the rule of evidence on which the objection is based.

Right. So sustained means you won. You won your objection. You were right. If it's overruled, it means your objection is no good and the questioning can continue.

Right. So sustained means you won. You won your objection. You were right. If it's overruled, it means your objection is no good and the questioning can continue.

Right. So sustained means you won. You won your objection. You were right. If it's overruled, it means your objection is no good and the questioning can continue.