Darryl Anka

He's actually labeled it that way, whereas 27 is the year of contact.

So we're going to see, I think, a lot more information coming out.

I think we are seeing that with, you know, the government hearings on whistleblowers and military people coming forward.

and stuff like that, you know, recent comments in the news that are obviously about disclosure.

So I think we're going to ultimately see more and more UFOs that are going to be caught on camera and probably on the news and get people used to the fact that these things are going on and have been going on for quite some time.

And that will set us up for the idea of not being so scared about the idea of meeting extraterrestrials more openly.

And over the 41 period, how have his predictions been when it comes to predicting timelines?

Well, he doesn't make predictions except when he knows the energy or feels the energy behind it is so strong that there's so much momentum that it's unlikely to change.

Got it.

Because his definition of predictions is that there's no such thing as a prediction of the future.

A prediction is made sensing the energy that exists at the moment the prediction is made.

And if that energy doesn't change, then it comes to pass.

But sometimes a prediction can render itself obsolete by being made known.

Because then if somebody doesn't want it to go that way, they can change it.

Oh, wow.

So the only time that he's actually made an open prediction is when, like I said...

He senses that the momentum behind that particular event is unlikely to change.

So, like, for example, in 1998, I think it was, he was recorded in one of the events as saying that by the end of 2001, there would be a terrorist attack on New York.

Obviously, that happened.

Wow.