Dave Dameshek

alabama and georgia have won though and i guess lsu you can put them in there too have won the lion's share of titles way more than any other conference um obviously also we shouldn't ignore the more recent history of what the big 10's done when the tournament gets going in whatever form it is whether it's uh four teams or 12 um and beyond but the pap

the hooey and applesauce of Feinbaum.

And this is what they always go to is, you know, you saw it last week when A&M was getting challenged at the half.

The case would immediately be like, see, it just shows how good the SEC is.

It's so deep.

You can never take a week off.

And Feinbaum's point there is, hey, you're knocking Bama.

They just beat four ranked teams, highly regarded.

Who regarded them highly?

Who talked them into, on some level, the record does some of the work, but also some of the commentary from high-profile media people puts teams like Missouri in play.

Is Missouri now still a highly regarded team?

Are all those ranked teams that were ranked a month ago, are they still highly considered?

Do they still deserve, to your eyeball, do they still deserve that high ranking that they had before they lost the game?

Of course not.

The idea that if you put Ohio State or Notre Dame or another high-end team or Oregon, let's throw them, if you threw them into the SEC, the idea, your results would be way worse.

You wouldn't be able to care.

What's the implication of that?

that you would have a record that Oregon would have South Carolina's record if they had to play that schedule, they would be good.

They would have about the same record as Alabama and Georgia, and those teams do right now and pretty much every year.

The argument is all predicated on jive as far as I'm concerned.