David Bianculli

And so there's a conflict there that I think we're going to see, but that hasn't yet become so public or become prominent.

And so there's a conflict there that I think we're going to see, but that hasn't yet become so public or become prominent.

You know, it's politically effective is a lot of it. There's a growing social consensus in favor of same-sex marriage, for example. There's opposition to discrimination in the workplace and a need for protection for those. But trans rights are much more conflicted. And Republican candidates have discovered in the last few years that it's a really good wedge issue.

You know, it's politically effective is a lot of it. There's a growing social consensus in favor of same-sex marriage, for example. There's opposition to discrimination in the workplace and a need for protection for those. But trans rights are much more conflicted. And Republican candidates have discovered in the last few years that it's a really good wedge issue.

You know, it's politically effective is a lot of it. There's a growing social consensus in favor of same-sex marriage, for example. There's opposition to discrimination in the workplace and a need for protection for those. But trans rights are much more conflicted. And Republican candidates have discovered in the last few years that it's a really good wedge issue.

It's not just something that motivates the right, but it motivates the center and even some parts of the left, too. We saw Trump's famous, you know, Trump is for you, Kamala is for they, them ad. And this is a place where I think the Project 2025 people find a place where they can bind themselves to Trump because Trump doesn't seem to care a great deal a lot about these things.

It's not just something that motivates the right, but it motivates the center and even some parts of the left, too. We saw Trump's famous, you know, Trump is for you, Kamala is for they, them ad. And this is a place where I think the Project 2025 people find a place where they can bind themselves to Trump because Trump doesn't seem to care a great deal a lot about these things.

It's not just something that motivates the right, but it motivates the center and even some parts of the left, too. We saw Trump's famous, you know, Trump is for you, Kamala is for they, them ad. And this is a place where I think the Project 2025 people find a place where they can bind themselves to Trump because Trump doesn't seem to care a great deal a lot about these things.

He is obviously not a great avatar for traditional family structure, but he does care a lot about trans issues for political reasons. And it becomes kind of the tip of the spear to get into more traditional values on and much of other things, whether that's abortion, whether that's mothers staying home by first talking about something that is unpopular.

He is obviously not a great avatar for traditional family structure, but he does care a lot about trans issues for political reasons. And it becomes kind of the tip of the spear to get into more traditional values on and much of other things, whether that's abortion, whether that's mothers staying home by first talking about something that is unpopular.

He is obviously not a great avatar for traditional family structure, but he does care a lot about trans issues for political reasons. And it becomes kind of the tip of the spear to get into more traditional values on and much of other things, whether that's abortion, whether that's mothers staying home by first talking about something that is unpopular.

They don't want it to be in the hands of the state. their first choice would be to have a full federal ban on abortion. And they understand that probably isn't something that would happen immediately, but they see a series of steps for how to fight that in the meantime.

They don't want it to be in the hands of the state. their first choice would be to have a full federal ban on abortion. And they understand that probably isn't something that would happen immediately, but they see a series of steps for how to fight that in the meantime.

They don't want it to be in the hands of the state. their first choice would be to have a full federal ban on abortion. And they understand that probably isn't something that would happen immediately, but they see a series of steps for how to fight that in the meantime.

That includes removing FDA approval for medical abortion drugs, using the 1873 Comstock Act to prevent them from being sent through the mail, And it means tracking much more aggressively what's going on at the state level.

That includes removing FDA approval for medical abortion drugs, using the 1873 Comstock Act to prevent them from being sent through the mail, And it means tracking much more aggressively what's going on at the state level.

That includes removing FDA approval for medical abortion drugs, using the 1873 Comstock Act to prevent them from being sent through the mail, And it means tracking much more aggressively what's going on at the state level.

So they want as much data as they can on where abortions are taking place, where the mothers are coming from, to track things like interstate abortion, which has become a new focus for the Republican Party in the last couple of years.

So they want as much data as they can on where abortions are taking place, where the mothers are coming from, to track things like interstate abortion, which has become a new focus for the Republican Party in the last couple of years.

So they want as much data as they can on where abortions are taking place, where the mothers are coming from, to track things like interstate abortion, which has become a new focus for the Republican Party in the last couple of years.