David Bianculli

They really do think that China is a threat and that the U.S. needs to be preparing to take it on.

Yeah. This is another gap between what Project 2025 advocates and what Trump has actually done. They see USAID as something that liberals have used mostly to push their favorite ideology.

Yeah. This is another gap between what Project 2025 advocates and what Trump has actually done. They see USAID as something that liberals have used mostly to push their favorite ideology.

Yeah. This is another gap between what Project 2025 advocates and what Trump has actually done. They see USAID as something that liberals have used mostly to push their favorite ideology.

Exactly. Well, they see it as not – it hasn't been used sufficiently as a tool of foreign policy and they would like to see it used that way. So they think it can counter China's Belt and Road Initiative. Rather than simply doing humanitarian projects, they want it to be – they want it to be a weapon in the US arsenal.

Exactly. Well, they see it as not – it hasn't been used sufficiently as a tool of foreign policy and they would like to see it used that way. So they think it can counter China's Belt and Road Initiative. Rather than simply doing humanitarian projects, they want it to be – they want it to be a weapon in the US arsenal.

Exactly. Well, they see it as not – it hasn't been used sufficiently as a tool of foreign policy and they would like to see it used that way. So they think it can counter China's Belt and Road Initiative. Rather than simply doing humanitarian projects, they want it to be – they want it to be a weapon in the US arsenal.

And instead, Trump has mostly demolished it, sought to close it and it appears to be on the way out.

And instead, Trump has mostly demolished it, sought to close it and it appears to be on the way out.

And instead, Trump has mostly demolished it, sought to close it and it appears to be on the way out.

Matthew Feeney, Ph.D. : Instead, what you see is an argument that the U.S. is not doing enough to drill oil and gas. It needs to free up regulation to do those things, and it needs to stop tracking climate regulations. It needs to stop doing research on climate and let private industry take over all of those things.

Matthew Feeney, Ph.D. : Instead, what you see is an argument that the U.S. is not doing enough to drill oil and gas. It needs to free up regulation to do those things, and it needs to stop tracking climate regulations. It needs to stop doing research on climate and let private industry take over all of those things.

Matthew Feeney, Ph.D. : Instead, what you see is an argument that the U.S. is not doing enough to drill oil and gas. It needs to free up regulation to do those things, and it needs to stop tracking climate regulations. It needs to stop doing research on climate and let private industry take over all of those things.

Unlike Trump, it basically ignores it. Trump has said it's a hoax. They don't do that. They just argue in a kind of vague fashion that – You know, innovation will solve the problems of climate change insofar as they exist. And they try to paint this positive vision where, you know, in the 1970s, the air was dirty and the rivers were burning. But we've made a lot of progress since then.

Unlike Trump, it basically ignores it. Trump has said it's a hoax. They don't do that. They just argue in a kind of vague fashion that – You know, innovation will solve the problems of climate change insofar as they exist. And they try to paint this positive vision where, you know, in the 1970s, the air was dirty and the rivers were burning. But we've made a lot of progress since then.

Unlike Trump, it basically ignores it. Trump has said it's a hoax. They don't do that. They just argue in a kind of vague fashion that – You know, innovation will solve the problems of climate change insofar as they exist. And they try to paint this positive vision where, you know, in the 1970s, the air was dirty and the rivers were burning. But we've made a lot of progress since then.

And now we need to let business go. And environmentalists just refuse to acknowledge that we have made this progress. And so they kind of try to ignore it. But they also want to get rid of a lot of the federal agencies that track data on climate and do the research that shows the dangers of climate change and shows where it's having effects already.

And now we need to let business go. And environmentalists just refuse to acknowledge that we have made this progress. And so they kind of try to ignore it. But they also want to get rid of a lot of the federal agencies that track data on climate and do the research that shows the dangers of climate change and shows where it's having effects already.

And now we need to let business go. And environmentalists just refuse to acknowledge that we have made this progress. And so they kind of try to ignore it. But they also want to get rid of a lot of the federal agencies that track data on climate and do the research that shows the dangers of climate change and shows where it's having effects already.

It's skeptical of wind power. They try to blame, for example, the Texas blackouts a few years ago on wind power. So they're not as – Well, address that.