David Bianculli

Yeah, they wanted to save money, and they point out that you can save money in an immediate term and actually cost money and cost yourself effectiveness in the long term, something maybe we're seeing with Elon Musk's stoge. They also just didn't have people trained.

There were so many people who did not want to serve in the first Trump administration that they simply could not fill jobs with qualified people. And sometimes when they tried to appoint people who were not qualified, Congress would not confirm them. And that's another one of the motivations for the big training of people and vetting of people for these jobs that Project 2025 did.

There were so many people who did not want to serve in the first Trump administration that they simply could not fill jobs with qualified people. And sometimes when they tried to appoint people who were not qualified, Congress would not confirm them. And that's another one of the motivations for the big training of people and vetting of people for these jobs that Project 2025 did.

There were so many people who did not want to serve in the first Trump administration that they simply could not fill jobs with qualified people. And sometimes when they tried to appoint people who were not qualified, Congress would not confirm them. And that's another one of the motivations for the big training of people and vetting of people for these jobs that Project 2025 did.

We don't. That database hasn't been made public. And we can look at a lot of the people who are contributors to Project 2025 and how they have come into top positions. But many of the people we're talking about are not names that I think would be household names and not in jobs that most people would think about or encounter.

We don't. That database hasn't been made public. And we can look at a lot of the people who are contributors to Project 2025 and how they have come into top positions. But many of the people we're talking about are not names that I think would be household names and not in jobs that most people would think about or encounter.

We don't. That database hasn't been made public. And we can look at a lot of the people who are contributors to Project 2025 and how they have come into top positions. But many of the people we're talking about are not names that I think would be household names and not in jobs that most people would think about or encounter.

They're in these low ranking positions where they can make a lot of difference to the way regulations are written and the way they're implemented. But they're not going to be in the public spotlight almost ever.

They're in these low ranking positions where they can make a lot of difference to the way regulations are written and the way they're implemented. But they're not going to be in the public spotlight almost ever.

They're in these low ranking positions where they can make a lot of difference to the way regulations are written and the way they're implemented. But they're not going to be in the public spotlight almost ever.

Trump is doing better in this term than he did in his first term. And he's doing better than Joe Biden did in getting people appointed into political jobs.

Trump is doing better in this term than he did in his first term. And he's doing better than Joe Biden did in getting people appointed into political jobs.

Trump is doing better in this term than he did in his first term. And he's doing better than Joe Biden did in getting people appointed into political jobs.

I think all of the things that they're interested in, including taking over so much power for the executive branch, are fundamentally in service of this social goal. So these are folks who have a very Christian and conservative view of the world, and they want to use all of the levers of government to do that.

I think all of the things that they're interested in, including taking over so much power for the executive branch, are fundamentally in service of this social goal. So these are folks who have a very Christian and conservative view of the world, and they want to use all of the levers of government to do that.

I think all of the things that they're interested in, including taking over so much power for the executive branch, are fundamentally in service of this social goal. So these are folks who have a very Christian and conservative view of the world, and they want to use all of the levers of government to do that.

And so they're looking at how the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Labor, The Department of Education or its functions can all be oriented around this. The Department of Justice. So, for example, they want to track student outcomes in schools based on family structure so they can encourage family structure.

And so they're looking at how the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Labor, The Department of Education or its functions can all be oriented around this. The Department of Justice. So, for example, they want to track student outcomes in schools based on family structure so they can encourage family structure.

And so they're looking at how the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Labor, The Department of Education or its functions can all be oriented around this. The Department of Justice. So, for example, they want to track student outcomes in schools based on family structure so they can encourage family structure.

They want to use the Labor Department to implement rules that will encourage people to stay home if they need to, to pay people to stay home. caring for children, presumably mothers or grandmothers, and to encourage people to be able to do work and support a family on a single income. A lot of this comes through the Department of Health and Human Services, which they'd like to use to ban abortion.