David Friedberg

But those don't give me the right to impose myself physically in the driveway with a car blocking law enforcement from doing their job.

If law enforcement was arresting a non illegal immigrant murderer,

and someone did that, would people be up in arms?

It's because people disagree with the law.

And if you disagree with the law, you've got to change the law.

And that's okay.

Now, right now, it is the case that it is the law that if someone came here without going through the immigration process as defined by the law, then they are technically here illegally.

That is the law.

That's what it is.

And so there is a course or a path or a point of view on how do you enforce that law.

And that is what people are having disagreements over.

And again, file injunctions if you don't like the methods, change the law if you don't like the law.

My personal view on immigration, just so I can wrap this all up.

I don't see how we're gonna do this in a humane and just way of removing people from this country who have been here for a period of time and have paid taxes and have been good contributors to this country.

I don't know how you're gonna do it.

I don't know how you're gonna do it without inciting a civil war.

So I think the compromise has to be that there has to be a path to permanent residency and eventually citizenship for individuals who have been in the United States for some period of time

who have followed other laws, who have paid taxes, and who have not taken advantage of public services that they are not supposed to use.

With those conditions met, there should be some path, otherwise we're gonna have civil war.

I think that separate to this, there's a bigger point to be made.