David Reimann

asking to do.

Just one last point on, well, two things.

One is that council's chastising us for filing something late.

I mean, this was a stipulated motion that got us here today.

We weren't asked to weigh in on it.

It was submitted to your honor with an order.

which they just assumed you would sign because it was stipulated.

It was only because this court said, no, I'm not going to do that.

I want to actually hear from the parties that we weighed in.

So this was not your typical deadline where we were invited to weigh in and just didn't.

Last thing is, in terms of docket access, Mr. Hunt and Mr. Judd and I are all officers of the court.

If the court

says you can have access to things that the parties are seeking to classify as non-public, but you can't share them with your clients until further notice from the court, that's fine.

Some judges do handle it that way.

Sometimes we just, if they don't concern closure, sometimes we don't weigh in at all.

But when they file things that they say we need to file this under seal and we're not allowed to see it,

then the briefing for you is not super helpful.

And so typically the way this happens is we are allowed attorney's eyes only access to documents just like the state and the defendants would be.

Their counsel can see things that are non-public and we don't share them with our clients unless the court orders otherwise.

And typically if the court decides, no, this really doesn't need to be