David Sachs

Words. Cameron or Tyler, do you want to?

Actually, Cameron, I think you said something earlier that I thought was really profound. You said that a year ago you thought it would be more likely that you'd end up in jail at the White House. Not to put you on the spot, because you didn't do anything wrong, but that was the environment a year ago. But do you guys want to say something?

Actually, Cameron, I think you said something earlier that I thought was really profound. You said that a year ago you thought it would be more likely that you'd end up in jail at the White House. Not to put you on the spot, because you didn't do anything wrong, but that was the environment a year ago. But do you guys want to say something?

Actually, Cameron, I think you said something earlier that I thought was really profound. You said that a year ago you thought it would be more likely that you'd end up in jail at the White House. Not to put you on the spot, because you didn't do anything wrong, but that was the environment a year ago. But do you guys want to say something?

You better clear that Solana position. What's your lockup? 24 months? Fuck no. He's trying to sell it to me on text message. Yeah, of course he is. We're negotiating discounts.

You better clear that Solana position. What's your lockup? 24 months? Fuck no. He's trying to sell it to me on text message. Yeah, of course he is. We're negotiating discounts.

You better clear that Solana position. What's your lockup? 24 months? Fuck no. He's trying to sell it to me on text message. Yeah, of course he is. We're negotiating discounts.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

The reign of terror against crypto is over. And the beginning of innovation in America for crypto has just begun.

The reign of terror against crypto is over. And the beginning of innovation in America for crypto has just begun.

The reign of terror against crypto is over. And the beginning of innovation in America for crypto has just begun.

Yeah.

Yeah.

You know, Sam just went straight for the endgame here, which is regulatory capture. Normally, when a tech executive goes and testifies at these hearings, they're in the hot seat and they get grilled. And that didn't happen here because, you know, Sam Allman basically bought into the narrative of these senators. And he basically conceded all these risks associated with AI. He talked about

You know, Sam just went straight for the endgame here, which is regulatory capture. Normally, when a tech executive goes and testifies at these hearings, they're in the hot seat and they get grilled. And that didn't happen here because, you know, Sam Allman basically bought into the narrative of these senators. And he basically conceded all these risks associated with AI. He talked about

Chat GPT-style models, if unregulated, could increase online misinformation, bolster cybercriminals, even threaten confidence in election systems. So he basically bought into the senator's narrative and, like you said, agreed to create a new agency that would license models and can take licenses away.

Chat GPT-style models, if unregulated, could increase online misinformation, bolster cybercriminals, even threaten confidence in election systems. So he basically bought into the senator's narrative and, like you said, agreed to create a new agency that would license models and can take licenses away.

He said that he would create safety standards, specific tests that a model has to pass before it can be deployed. He says he would require independent audits who can say the model is or isn't in compliance.