David Sacks

And then they said could be aided.

directly or indirectly.

That is not what a conflict of interest is.

The standard is having a direct and predictable effect on an interest, not indirect.

And there's nothing in that story that shows that I had a direct benefit.

Yeah, well, thank you.

Yeah, I mean, look, they don't want the results.

I mean, they consider the results to be a negative.

And what they're trying to do is criminalize policy disagreements.

That's really what's going on.

Now, at one point, my comms person who was dealing with the New York Times asked them, you know, what friends are you talking about?

Like, what friends did he benefit?

And they couldn't name a specific one.

I think this is why you guys, why they mentioned all in tequila and the all in summits.

I think maybe they're trying to portray you guys as the friends who benefited.

Somehow we sold more tequila.

You're here half-time.

From the get-go, it was a non-profit event.

We did not sell tickets.

We gave them all away for free.