David Sacks

And that is kind of my view on AI is that ultimately we have to have a solution of checks and balances.

If the AI market becomes monopolized and falls into the hands of one or two companies, I would use antitrust law very aggressively as a check and balance against their power.

Right now, we have a very competitive market.

We have five frontier labs competing very aggressively.

As long as the market is competitive, I would use that because I think competition generates the best outcomes.

It helps us win against China, but it also protects the population because these companies, if they get out of line, there's some competitor that can offer something better.

Consumers can opt out of it.

If they don't trust ChatGPT, they can use Anthropic.

Or if they don't trust Anthropic, they can go to Grok.

Bill, you had the number one rated talk at the All In Summit in history, 2,851 miles.

You have been famously against regulatory capture.

In light of the Pope's comments of, hey, regulating, what do you think is common sense?

Because AI is everything.

AI can help people make bioweapons.

It can also help people get their term paper in or be a better salesperson at Oracle.

We're talking about paper.

We're talking about oxygen here.

This is like a fundamental horizontal technology.

So where do you think

There is a case to regulating AI, if at all.