David Sacks

being lost or being retired and transitioned out.

And as to your vibe shift, I think it's because, candidly, people's houses have been Molotov cocktailed because they're doomerism.

And people specifically are citing that when they shoot at their houses and throw Molotov cocktails at them twice in the same week.

And if you're IPOing and you're coming out saying, hey, jobs are going away, jobs are going away, that's just a really bad look.

And or it's because we called it out and they got caught.

And so now they were telling the truth.

All right, everybody, this has been another amazing episode of the All In Podcast.

Thanks for coming, Bill Gurley.

Yeah, Tulsi's great.

She's amazing.

That's episode 275 in the can.

We'll see you next time.

Bye-bye.

I'm not sure when this idea that you feed the whole model into a context window to train itself and build a new model is going to happen.

I'm not sure when this idea that you feed the whole model into a context window to train itself and build a new model is going to happen.

But I think there's probably a lot of different architectural paths that could be walked here.

But I think there's probably a lot of different architectural paths that could be walked here.

One of which is this idea that you could make much smaller models and then create networks of smaller models that work together where you ultimately have less energy or less cost per token produced out of a

One of which is this idea that you could make much smaller models and then create networks of smaller models that work together where you ultimately have less energy or less cost per token produced out of a

aggregation of models than you did with one single large model.