David Sacks

Oh, very inappropriate.

He called it gynofascism.

He said that all of the regulatory is a safety thing and it's like a very feminine, safety, protective kind of...

origin in a lot of the regulations that have been passed that make it impossible.

Everything's about safety and more regulation, more regulation, more regulation.

And as a result, you can't get anything done and the lawyers show up and everything gets sued.

What's the right way to think about the origin?

Because his argument is that there's a mindset of safety and protectionism that's driven this.

Is it just the trial lawyers?

Or like, why does someone keep passing?

Why do the legislators keep passing laws over and over and layers and layers and layers and layers that make it impossible to build and make it super expensive to maintain?

What's your metric for being governor of California as it relates to housing?

What's the dashboard you're going to put up and what's your goal?

What do you want to get to in your

So each of those get a metric?

What does that need to get to?

Where is it today?

Where does it need to get to?

If you become governor, you're going to be fighting against a legislature that's got all of the various vested interests tied up in keeping this from happening.

How do you take action without partnership with the legislature?