David Sacks

So again, they're kind of pretending like they did this unbelievable investigation.

And they find the 449.

Can you just put up this paragraph on the screen here?

Because really, every sentence in this paragraph kind of reveals the sham of this story.

Mr. Sachs has positioned himself to personally benefit.

Not true.

I mean, I was already an investor in all these companies, and I positioned myself to divest.

Then it says I had 449 stakes in companies with ties to artificial intelligence.

By the way, that whole phrase ties to is total journalism weasel words because ties to can mean anything.

And every company in the economy is going to have ties to artificial intelligence.

And then they said could be aided.

directly or indirectly.

That is not what a conflict of interest is.

The standard is having a direct and predictable effect on an interest, not indirect.

And there's nothing in that story that shows that I had a direct benefit.

Yeah, well, thank you.

Yeah, I mean, look, they don't want the results.

I mean, they consider the results to be a negative.

And what they're trying to do is criminalize policy disagreements.

That's really what's going on.