Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Libraries Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing

David Webber

👤 Speaker
370 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

Yeah, it put that case into the minds of the jury, something that they probably didn't expect when they turned up for jury duty, that they'd have this almost history lesson of these serial killers, because that's what David and Catherine Burney were.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

Well, the jury would have had to find that Roman Reddington could not have been found guilty of murder beyond reasonable doubt because by creating reasonable doubt, which is, you know, David and Catherine Burney might have done it.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

Now, David and Catherine Burney being active in the later part of 1986, even though it was months after Sharon Fulton had gone missing...

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

Police would have looked at other possibilities, other possible victims, even though David Burney was quite forthcoming about the four murders.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

And of course, he couldn't deny what had happened with the 17-year-old that escaped the clutches.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

So while he was forthcoming about what happened to Susanna Candy, Noelene Patterson, Denise Brown and Mary Nielsen, he didn't mention Sharon Fulton.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

So why not?

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

I mean, if you're going to talk about everything that you'd done with Catherine Burney, Catherine Burney was apparently not

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

as forthcoming initially, but ultimately the evidence was mounting.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

So why didn't Catherine Burney talk about Sharon Fulton?

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

To the extent that she may have been part of the investigation into the Burneys, it didn't lead anywhere.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

We heard that Raymond Reddington had said to a subsequent partner, she asked him, you know, what happened?

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

Because we'd heard evidence from the kids that, you know, it wasn't something that was talked about.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

But certainly a subsequent partner wanted to know and asked him and he said, oh, the Bernies killed her.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

So this is...

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

late 80s, early 90s, around the turn of 1990 when he'd said that.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

And so I suspect that's the kernel of the defence case.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

It's not something that I would suggest, it's not something that the defence lawyer came up with.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

There's something, there's a starting point there.

The Case Of
02 Sharon’s Disappearance | What Robert Fulton stood to lose

So there was a secret recording that was made.