Delia D'Ambra
π€ SpeakerVoice Profile Active
This person's voice can be automatically recognized across podcast episodes using AI voice matching.
Appearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
I think dynamics like this and other wild spinoff theories as to who might be responsible for Julie's death just made this case a lot more difficult to try and solve as the years dragged on.
For example, one theory that cropped up speculated that Julie might not have been the innocent, wildlife-loving photographer she presented herself as.
Some people believed she might have been a British spy who'd come across damning information about the activities of powerful Kenyan political figures in the reserve.
It's unclear, though, if anyone with any authority ever really pursued that theory beyond just it was possible.
And naturally, John Ward and the Scotland Yard denounced it as completely unfounded, which at this point in the story isn't a huge surprise to me.
By 2004, a formal inquest in the UK had been held to help snuff out rumors like this, and that proceeding concluded with the same ruling.
But another wild theory that surfaced as a result of that inquest had to do with Julie being struck by lightning.
I know, we're back to that scenario again.
Articles by Michael Horsnell and Patrick Barkham reported that way back in the fall of 1988, John Ward and some of his supporters had been told by a former MI6 officer that British intelligence agents had covertly inquired about Julie's murder shortly after news of her death broke.
One agent had allegedly determined that she'd gotten her Jeep stuck in the mud, walked to find help, become lost, and started a fire beneath a tree.
She'd then climbed that tree to possibly be safe from threats on the ground, but then lightning struck her and it was so powerful it had severed her body, causing her to fall into the fire where animals later scavenged her remains.
To say this theory feels like a stretch is an understatement, and it's worth noting it wasn't really something that the press reported on until many years after the crime.
So of course, when reporters did find out about it, they couldn't help but go to press immediately.
The British forensic pathologist who conducted Julie's second autopsy in England, though, was not convinced the whole lightning strike theory was credible, purely from a logical standpoint.
He told the Daily Telegraph, quote, when you are struck by lightning, your body doesn't fall into pieces with your legs, arm, and head falling off.
I hope we don't hear any more of this nonsense.
It's monstrous rubbish, end quote.
It was also in 2004 that several big lies from the past started to unravel.
For example, Dr. Shaker, the first pathologist in Kenya whose autopsy report had been changed, admitted that he'd agreed to let his bosses amend his initial report to cover up evidence that pointed to murder.