Demon Erasers

It was red.

And you're just sitting there like, damn, these stories are fucking similar.

But I know that they can't both be true.

I know that they live together.

So.

I'm concluding that these stories happen to one person and the other person liked these stories and adopted them as their own.

And now you're thinking like, well, damn, who's telling the truth and who's the liar?

And so Sean pulls out the photo book and starts showing actual pictures of these stories.

stories so he has the actual proof so it's like you know that we lived in close contact you know these are great stories I want to sound cool but he has the actual proof so my interpretation of the archaeological record is that we can look at the Jewish people we can see what their religion was before we can see the specific event it was very traumatic King Nebuchadnezzar conquered them they believed that it was you know Yahweh and whatever name you want to give it they believed that it was that God that gave power to King Nebuchadnezzar

And the archaeological record to me says that they didn't have these stories of Adam and Eve.

They didn't have these stories of the flood.

Well, how would we know that?

So archaeology, I will grant it, it is not a perfect...

It's not a photo album.

It is not a perfect science.

However, I do feel that when you look at archaeological dating methods, that they are somewhat sound and reasonably credible.

And I get that.

But my point there is that when you're objective and you have no emotional connection to it,

then you're willing to admit, okay, you know what I mean?

Maybe they're not perfect, but they do have some reasonableness to them.