Demon Erasers

So as long as it comes at the benefit of someone else.

What I would say is wrong is when it's a zero sum game and my benefit is coming at your expense.

And what you ultimately see in those situations is that when I'm living at the expense of others, I think I'm being benefited, but ultimately I'm not.

And when you go to like ecological systems, I'm obsessed with regenerative agriculture.

And you look at what happens in the soil and how nothing exists in a vacuum.

And there's this whole symbiotic relationship

where if something is being taken, it's being given back at the same time.

So to sit there and say that I'm motivated by good because it makes me feel good.

And like I said, I'm not talking about a whim, I'm talking about that deeper meaning.

I don't think there's anything immoral or wrong with that.

So as long as my good is also associated with your good.

I'm not gonna feel good about taking $100,000 from you, but I would feel good about making $100,000.

Like you're a marketer, I market too.

I would feel great about making $100,000 off of you because I just helped you launch a product and you just did $10 million in sales.

we both benefited.

So my whole concept of morality is symbiotic.

And I think that when you look at life, the only reason life exists is because of that symbiotic relationship where if something is taken, it is given back.

If it's only a one way street,

things don't sustain themselves and ecosystems that have actors to where they're just taking from the system and they're not giving back, they ultimately collapse.

And you see that in the human body with cancer cells.