Demon Erasers

and then you're willing to go back and bend things and twist them to fit that belief versus being an objective person and saying, okay, am I really okay with that?

Does that really make sense?

And one of the examples I'll bring up, because I know you said you want to talk about this, is the original creation stories.

So my understanding of the archaeological record is that the Jewish religion was completely and totally different before 587 B.C.,

Wow.

Yeah.

So what I'm saying is there was no mention of Adam and Eve.

There was no mention of the Garden of Eden before 587 B.C.

They came in contact with these stories.

That's when King Nebuchadnezzar subjected the Israeli people into captivity and brought them into Babylon.

And the Jewish scholars believed that it was Enlil Jehovah that gave power to King Nebuchadnezzar to conquer them and subject them.

So they came in contact with the original stories where Enki the Wise, the snake wrapped around the tree, was the true benefactor of mankind.

And he wanted mankind to be elevated to the status of a god.

And so this is why he truthfully, in the original story, told Eve, partake of the tree of knowledge of good and evil and ye shall be as gods.

And so they changed the story so that they made what you believe to be the devil.

to be the liar, and they made Enlil Jehovah, who was actually the liar in the original story, they made him to be the benefactor of mankind.

So when these documents were discovered in 1855, it sent a lot of turmoil through the Christian community.

And there was a pastor, and his response was, the devil put these tablets in the desert to test your faith.

And that's the kind of mental gymnastics where it's just, to me, if you are being objective,

and you're not emotionally attached to this religion for whatever reasons, you just can't accept that.